@zyxi78: Egypt robbed #foryoupage❤️❤️ #blowthisupforme #goviral #WellplayedEgypt #adhammy

Dimitris_3 :

bro it was a fair match

sirex2000 :

Fair match btw any accuse to rival Messi ✌️

alif :

Egypt was leading 2-0 until the 78th minute. The referee was good, VAR was good, FIFA was good too! But in the 79th minute Argentina scored, then made a great comeback and won the match—wow! Suddenly the referee was bad, VAR was bad

Mike :

Messi vs the world

badquality_facts :

lost zoro rants🤫🗺💚⚔️ :

we made the best comebacks and if you know the rules that was not a foul and messi missed the penalty anyway

ıuªᗡ ✐ :

First foul review and disallowed qoal was correct. Salah didn't get foul, defender got the ball first and rest r momentum play on both player ran into each other with no plaver possess of the ball which results in no foul As for the other play he was barelv touch from behind ano dived like the end of the world as for the hand reach aqainst Egypt, EGY player dodge which results in no foul.

imar_lekurde13 :

Incident 1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because: 1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase. 2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play. Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because: 1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase. 2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez. 3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.

會AtomicVex☄️ :

Incident 1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because: 1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase. 2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play. Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because: 1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase. 2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez. 3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.

V_Hankoo3 :

This is to all the people who says the match was rigged Incident 1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because: 1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase. 2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play. Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because: 1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase. 2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez. 3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.

iloveoliviarodrigo300 :

I just don’t understand Messi won the World Cup last time why does Fifa want him to win again

the best player :

Egypt vs messi X FIFA

Chriss :

on my mom's birthday too...

mamzz :

I feel you my bro it’s fifa vs world now

𝑫𝒆𝒍𝒚 :

Foul on salah wasn’t the foul because, player made contact on the ball before he touched the ball, according to which fifa rule wasn’t it a foul, because If a defender clearly plays the ball first and any contact with the attacker is a natural result of that challenge, it is often not a foul under the International Football Association Board Laws of the Game (Law 12 – Fouls and Misconduct

Bebe :

Messi unstoppable

Batman :

Arguments?

Gino :

Egypt was leading 2-0 until the 78th minute. The referee was good, VAR was good, FIFA was good too! But in the 79th minute Argentina scored, then made a great comeback and won the match—wow! Suddenly the referee was bad, VAR was bad