@alyssatavares__: officially done w fifa #notjoking #foryou #rigged #fifa #argentinavsegypt

listomy :

You cannot be real if you think this is a foul

2sikk_ :

you can tell who just started watching soccer

im__so___tired :

because he touched the ball first, it is Salah that needs to play technical to get around him. Not fall on the ground after he losses the ball😭

minte :

that’s never a foul wtf 😭 he’s already lost the ball

. :

This is the real foul btw

911 gt1 :

Trip would be a penalty if he still has the possession of the ball but he already lost it there it cannot be penalty no ball just a trip

Iku :

That’s clean he touched the ball smh

🖤 :

Salah dived after losing the ball. It is not a foul

T O S C A :

if this is foul i’m drake

?? :

Wtf? Why’s he diving bruh

❖ 𝐐 𝐀 𝐇 𝐍 𝐀 𝐀 𝐑 𝐈 𝐍 ❖ :

Thats Not a foul Kid Lets Debate

ian :

he won the ball salah left it behind him and tripped no foul what so ever

Iancu Iulian :

let me guess,ronaldo fan?

Naija Rabbit :

its not a foul habibi

anomie :

posting to post

Chrislo.sol :

This isn’t a foul. But never was the “foul” that disallowed Egypt’s second goal

Winston J Matthews :

Salah don't even believe that's a foul. The ball was won and he dived, he wasnt even in possession, the foul is actually on the Argentina player tbh

𝐇𝐬𝐮🌸 :

@Ly:Incident 1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because: 1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase. 2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play. Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because: 1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase. 2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez. 3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.

mda_rlx :

Where is the foul?

jdes025 :

you can't give a penalty over that. Be so fr

🍉 :

it wasn't a penalty because the defender won the ball first. The contact happened after the attacker had already lost possession, and the challenge was not careless or reckless. According to the IFAB Laws of the Game, normal contact after a fair tackle is not a foul.

Human :

Legendamurik2011 :

he touched ball first son

L1flappy :

he touched the ball didn't he?