Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because:
1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase.
2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play.
Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because:
1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase.
2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez.
3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.
2026-07-07 21:57:41
0
PEDRO_3k :
Ok but what about that ???
2026-07-07 19:06:04
779
germek :
NO FAUL, end of the debate.
2026-07-07 19:16:33
94
userrr734971 :
Nah who’s that who dribbled past the field dude’s a baller😭
2026-07-07 20:16:44
49
user.1726353 :
clearly hit his foot
2026-07-07 18:33:41
455
D-A :
Please go watch football bro the defender had the first touch before the salah tackle 😂😂😂😂 thats why it didn’t count as a foul
2026-07-07 19:10:19
25
Discottek :
los q opinan q es robo, nunca jugaron al fútbol
2026-07-07 21:46:44
4
Astxx7 :
Idk who that player is but that was a beautiful run
2026-07-07 19:26:16
58
okbyronn :
As a Ronaldo fan it’s not rigged
2026-07-07 20:21:15
47
Leoo✝️ :
Salah lit tripped on himself and then dived😂😂
2026-07-07 18:46:38
61
carl⚽️❤️✝️ :
buddy salah stood up.and didn't react
2026-07-07 18:52:40
6
Chinx Ripz :
Salah lost the ball, tripped on the defenders foot, and flopped🤣
2026-07-07 19:25:27
8
lakhes21 :
but it's a clear foul what do you want
2026-07-07 18:51:46
71
Ivan :
salah dived lol
2026-07-07 18:35:11
55
Bebeto :
What a beautiful goal!
2026-07-07 19:33:41
14
Anas2goated🕋☪️ :
I know they didn’t call not one foul got called on salah
2026-07-07 18:26:24
9
viccc19 :
Did this guy make Egypt blow a 2-0 lead?
2026-07-07 21:48:54
6
Jens_Seneca :
Most obvious foul
2026-07-07 18:36:18
6
Junior Biano :
It was actually a foul. The rules do state that VAR can review the play building from the foul which they did review and awarded no goal. Also the rules state that the player should be given a yellow card if they take shirt off or pull it over head which the ref didn’t give one… My view is the ref should’ve allowed the goal same way he allowed the play to build. (Disclaimer) neither of these are my side…#1 🇫🇷
2026-07-07 20:39:30
6
Obsyd™ :
2026-07-07 18:58:38
0
usayd18 :
😮
2026-07-07 21:27:30
1
usayd18 :
It’s not about it being a foul or not…it’s about the consistency because it’s the same type of contact that happen on the Egypt disallowed goal
2026-07-07 21:28:58
0
To see more videos from user @freshedits08, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.