lil
Region: US
Tuesday 07 July 2026 18:28:31 GMT
365163
35301
1074
9067
Music
Download
Comments
inon :
Incident 1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because: 1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase. 2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play. Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because: 1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase. 2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez. 3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.
2026-07-08 01:32:32
13
Tex :
WTF ARE U TALKING ABT
2026-07-08 01:47:14
8
Lubo💫 :
THE MOST W MESSI FAN.
2026-07-07 21:55:34
1601
kanarka :
what abt portugal croatia
2026-07-08 01:43:26
6
adn. :
Stepping on foot + Pulling Jersey = Foul 😭😭😭
2026-07-07 18:32:38
1561
♛ :
U ain’t no Messi fan stsu😭
2026-07-08 00:15:50
10
🅼🅰🆃🅴🅹🅰 :
Bro is not a Messi Fan hahaah😂😂
2026-07-08 01:02:09
8
Tshepo 🧩♣️ :
Did he just say his a messi fan
2026-07-08 01:50:28
0
rg :
amazing script
2026-07-07 18:42:06
190
crxy79 :
As a Ronaldo fan that was the most fair game I’ve seen
2026-07-07 23:49:02
8
Υαнıκø :
did you even watch the game💔 its not rigged
2026-07-08 01:08:59
68
Phoenix Alexander 🕴️ :
You definitely did not watch the game then😂😭😭
2026-07-08 00:56:57
6
el.ahmedd_ :
iam Messi fan and i agree with you
2026-07-08 01:04:59
13
To see more videos from user @lilknowsball, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
