@🎧moody: @🎧moody: Incident 1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because:
1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase.
2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play.
Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because:
1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase.
2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez.
3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.
2026-07-07 23:37:28
5
anii :
argentina
2026-07-08 03:49:38
11
اَلْـشَّـامِـيْ :
كان حلم جميل 🇪🇬💔
2026-07-08 02:47:51
56
𝓝𝓸𝓽_𝔂𝓪𝓼𝓸𝓸𝓸 :
Seeing Moustafa shobier sit there even tho he cared us till here is is sad asf😕😕😞😞
2026-07-07 22:08:06
3
albolocxra :
Le anularon un gol a Egipto penal para Messi y no le anularon el 3 a argentina era faul a Mohamed salah
2026-07-07 21:49:54
9
essa :
Amazing game by Egypt ❤️
2026-07-07 18:49:55
133
bbbb :
being hated for the best is amazing 😭
2026-07-08 02:44:26
68
fashionistia :
In my heart Egypt won 💔
2026-07-07 20:15:16
55
𝙔𝙤𝙪𝙨𝙞𝙛.966🐊 :
Even tho I am Iraqi but wallah Egypt was actually good and specially mostafa shobier
2026-07-07 18:44:14
67
VORT3X :
Argentina may have won the World Cup but Egypt won our hearts.
2026-07-08 07:00:36
19
To see more videos from user @ndd_ftbl, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.