Peter
Region: LB
Tuesday 07 July 2026 18:52:11 GMT
86092
3014
278
358
Music
Download
Comments
.. :
It’s football not a war bro you can be Egyptian and support Argentina it’s fine
2026-07-08 20:04:19
6
💫livia :
It literally said “ we agreed earlier in this chat “ it’s fake bro
2026-07-09 03:13:57
57
my rivals my idols :
that's why I like chat gpt
2026-07-08 15:45:26
86
thebest :
ALL THE CALLS WERE RIGHT! Incident 1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because: 1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase. 2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play. Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because: 1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase. 2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez. 3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.
2026-07-08 13:14:38
48
r7zwan.dxb :
What prompt did u give before the question
2026-07-08 11:26:58
17
MessiOnTop🇦🇷🏆😂🐐 :
penaldo 0 world cups
2026-07-09 02:56:56
4
🌙 :
You took so long
2026-07-07 21:04:39
8
HenrySigma72 :
The Real answer is:fifa
2026-07-09 01:27:40
0
ybsaigal :
dw take your time
2026-07-08 18:31:24
1
ꜱxɴᴏ 🎭 :
Third hashtag is funny
2026-07-08 16:41:43
2
@ :
You asked ChatGPT to say Egypt that’s why it said as we agreed earlier
2026-07-08 21:11:06
3
KingMax8358💙🤴 :
I always argue with Chatgpt lol he makes me mad all the time
2026-07-08 20:30:55
1
To see more videos from user @peterkh20, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
