lightskin gio ☦️
Region: CA
Tuesday 07 July 2026 18:53:10 GMT
73012
10943
466
1519
Music
Download
Comments
Pro clubs :
Egypt might have lost but win our hearts idc
2026-07-07 18:58:23
164
Celina :
Unfair 💔
2026-07-08 06:54:55
3
Octa🐜🇦🇷 :
Incident 1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because: 1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase. 2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play. Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because: 1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase. 2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez. 3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.
2026-07-08 02:02:45
5
Zoey🌸🌸 :
y is my fyp betraying me broo teamm messi all the way
2026-07-07 18:59:12
15
Flux :
Wdym the third goal didn’t count bro😭it was a clear foul
2026-07-07 18:56:11
50
Yousef :
the ref after the match
2026-07-07 19:25:00
80
𝑻.𝑴 :
the moment he understand
2026-07-08 04:35:50
2
𝑻.𝑴 :
The referee after the match
2026-07-08 04:34:55
0
OttoPotto🥰🥰🥰 :
it's step on foot AND he was holding the shirt how WOULDNT It be a foul
2026-07-07 19:06:27
12
☦️M☦️ :
ngl Egypt play good vs FIFA
2026-07-07 23:16:42
50
Qiluki :
fifa vs Egypt
2026-07-07 19:35:59
19
Randomstuff :
Man I love being a Messi fan, the tears are so sweet 😂
2026-07-07 20:15:15
21
To see more videos from user @lightskin.gio, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
