@lnitol: Egypt disallowed goal#infantino #worldcup #argentina #messi #egypt

SHINee :

FIFA, we demand a transparent investigation into the refereeing of the Egypt-Argentina match. The voice of the fans must be heard, because the fans deserve justice, and the national teams deserve a level playing field. If refereeing errors are proven to have affected the outcome of the match, we demand the full application of the regulations and the implementation of appropriate measures according to the laws, because the integrity of football is more important than any result. We will not stop demanding justice and transparency, as the fans have the right to witness a fair and just competition. Football is based on fairness, and if justice is lost, the competition is lost. #JusticeForEgypt EgyptsRight #ReviewTheMatch

ChFells :

FIFA, we demand a transparent investigation into the refereeing of the Egypt-Argentina match. The voice of the fans must be heard, because the fans deserve justice, and the national teams deserve a level playing field. If refereeing errors are proven to have affected the outcome of the match, we demand the full application of the regulations and the implementation of appropriate measures according to the laws, because the integrity of football is more important than any result. We will not stop demanding justice and transparency, as the fans have the right to witness a fair and just competition. Football is based on fairness, and if justice is lost, the competition is lost. #JusticeForEgypt EgyptsRight #ReviewTheMatch

Maicel💚🖤 :

😂😂😂

♫⃠ :

Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because: 1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase. 2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play. Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because: 1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase. 2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez. 3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.

🤑 :

Cm⚽️ :

It was 100 percent a foul

Brandito😌💫 :

But buddy they scored after that idk why u mad 🫠

🏝️teo ✝️ :

It was a foul

Peteyyyyyyyyyyyyyy😂😂😂😂😂😂 :

@Peteyyyyyyyyyyyyyy😂😂😂😂😂😂: Can 150k people like my viedo ?

￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴￴￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ :

will.bred :

Even if it was a foul why didn’t they pull it up earlier? They just kept playing on

ᴶᴼᴿᴰᴬᴺ ★ :

There’s a man.

Patryk_kk👶🏿 :

just look the entire operation