Incident 1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because:
1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase.
2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play.
Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because:
1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase.
2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez.
3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.
2026-07-08 08:32:11
10
Lucidluke💫 :
You prob mean art of the referee comeback
2026-07-08 10:18:23
0
ronaldo :
FIFAvs Egypt
2026-07-08 09:08:26
6
K_Bnce :
The art of fifa
2026-07-08 08:31:02
5
games pleyer :
fifas come back not messi
2026-07-08 08:48:50
5
kucing_ :
Art of comeback❎
Art of money✅
2026-07-08 10:18:43
1
Rosie 🌷✨ :
the most unfair match ever
2026-07-08 00:10:13
2
𝔇𝔲𝔩𝔢 :
the art of refs
2026-07-08 08:46:17
0
Ksamon12 :
Art of the ref
2026-07-08 08:13:08
0
CANCA :
as an argentina fan it was kinda unfair for egypt
2026-07-08 09:16:47
4
Luiz diaz :
Egypt should have win.i just have one question.since when the goal egypt was offside.
2026-07-08 01:53:19
1
vnk marca :
Art of referee. your REAL motm
2026-07-08 06:58:55
4
Larry king :
art of roberry
2026-07-08 07:04:31
3
To see more videos from user @reaura3, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.