𝗻𝗮𝘆𝗷𝗿
Region: DE
Tuesday 07 July 2026 19:26:02 GMT
98683
10764
381
3334
Music
Download
Comments
Rey :
song name?
2026-07-08 05:15:35
1
Satan en personne :
the FIFA always won
2026-07-07 19:27:41
106
𝐈𝐒𝐀𝐆𝐈爱 :
me devolviste al 2022 con ese audio Dios
2026-07-07 23:07:51
24
ً :
Old phonk
2026-07-08 02:42:59
39
Sɪғꫝᴛ⸙💥 :
when salah know the game😵💫
2026-07-08 06:50:34
3
SNOW :
Ronaldo fan
2026-07-07 20:21:32
38
𝒶𝓃𝒹𝓇ℯ𝓈 :
volvimos al 2022
2026-07-08 04:27:31
6
Héctor Castañeda :
Name music?
2026-07-08 05:48:12
0
ᴋ ᴀ ɪ ꜱ ᴇ ʀ ★ :
Egypt won.
2026-07-08 02:04:52
36
ahmed69420 :
egypt vs fifa
2026-07-07 23:31:07
28
James_hates_you :
ALL THE CALLS WERE RIGHT Incident 1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because: 1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase. 2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play. Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because: 1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase. 2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez. 3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.
2026-07-08 00:45:24
33
To see more videos from user @nay.cct, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
