@11_dimamaghrib: Ts was rigged🫩✌️ #messi #fifa #ref #rigged #xyzbca

adam_l20 :

Egypt was leading 2–0 until the 78th minute. The referee was good, VAR was good, and FIFA was good too! But in the 79th minute, Argentina scored, made a great comeback, and won the match. Wow! Suddenly, the referee was bad, and VAR was bad.

UiP :

Yesterday's match

idk :

Ref deleted his insta after 😭😭🥀

iiform :

1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase. 2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play. Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because: 1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase. 2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez. 3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.

𝐌𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐨👾 :

For you Ronaldo fans Incident 1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because: 1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase. 2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play. Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because: 1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase. 2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez. 3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.

𝐮𝐬𝐞𝐫_𝐠𝐬𝐩𝐨𝟖𝟗 :

The game was not robbed

Miskaxjasper :

Zero arguments

Frostydino11 :

Void.exe :

Egypt was leading 2-0 until the 78th minute. The referee was good, VAR was good, FIFA was good too! But in the 79th minute Argentina scored, then made a great comeback and won the match—wow! Suddenly the referee was bad, VAR was bad

bossman35678193746291774 :

Mbappe is the best it doesn’t even matter

Gojo satoru :

Just saying anything just to make you happy

Sir_Alex :