@martinellivault07: Egypt were robbed. #fyp #egypt #argentina #robbed #worldcup

user 9 :

Epicgdbackup :

coolmandawson :

This game was pure corruption. FIFA should be embarrassed, and Israeli ran competition behind the curtains🇮🇱

finnnn :

Samir :

Amazing tackle first slide btw

LABUBUUPIN :

jangan kritik messi ges ntar dikira fansnya ronaldo

￴ ￴￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ ￴￴￴ ￴￴ ￴￴￴ ￴￴ ￴ :

The first one isn’t a foul only because Salah dived before he stepped on his feet

LonusDevko :

The first one isn't foul, clear as day.

:/ :

Zero controversy in this match btw💔🙏💔

-K- :

bizarrr :

@abii:@lynne:@agre:buat yg ngatain dibantu wasit noh baca. 1. Intervensi VAR valid: Insiden itu adalah bagian dari permainan build-up berkelanjutan yang mengarah langsung ke tujuan. Menurut aturan, VAR berhak meninjau fase tersebut. 2. Itu adalah pelanggaran: Pemain menginjak Lisandro saat dia menguasai bola. Stamping ini mencegahnya mengambil langkah untuk berlari, yang merupakan penghalang permainan. Insiden 2: Tidak ada hukuman yang diberikan karena: 1. Mo Salah sudah kehilangan penguasaan bola: Itu tidak lagi dianggap sebagai fase menyerang aktif. 2. Kaki Alvarez tidak bergerak: Mo Salah yang memulai kontak dengan menggerakkan kakinya ke Alvarez. Jenis kontak ini biasanya hanya dihukum jika pemain yang bergerak menyerang, tetapi seperti yang dinyatakan pada poin 1, Salah sudah kehilangan bola. Dari perspektif lain, Salah justru menghalangi Alvarez. 3. Kontaknya sangat minim: Sentuhannya terlalu ringan untuk dianggap pelanggaran.

M :

ɯı̣ןʞɐɯı̣ן :

nonton lig ang gue ya semalam😭😹

kipas288 :

Gavi = messi

george.6.7.6.7 :

Also the tackle at the end of the game he fell over and the Egypt player got booked

Seth.frickin.rollins :

The first isn’t a foul because Nico Gonzalez makes contact with the ball first and then number 2 isn’t a foul it’s a light tug and not punishable

Jackson :

Incident 1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because: 1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase. 2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play. Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because: 1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase. 2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez. 3. The contact of De Paul was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.