🌟
Region: US
Tuesday 07 July 2026 19:50:38 GMT
1982144
280307
4377
35547
Music
Download
Comments
ohC :
Incident 1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because: 1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase. 2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play. Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because: 1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase. 2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez. 3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.
2026-07-09 05:02:24
0
🌞 :
rather lose like Ronaldo, then win like Messi!
2026-07-08 06:04:35
2313
Mr.P Mr.P :
This World Cup is a joke
2026-07-07 21:19:14
9717
Abdihakim :
FIFA vs Egypt
2026-07-07 22:22:47
8925
الحكم إبن العرص إلي طلعنا :
إيه رأيكم في اداءي يرجاله
2026-07-08 12:54:04
5
†Not_H† :
feel Bad for egypt they should've won
2026-07-08 00:43:52
79
Baim bukan artis :
bayangin seberapa hancur hati mereka di curangi💔
2026-07-08 14:15:51
5
CRASHOUT :
NO FAIR
2026-07-09 04:17:55
0
Najib :
Cape verde and Eygpt💔
2026-07-07 23:45:50
606
𝕯𝖊𝖛𝖟 :
at least they tried😕...
2026-07-08 14:06:33
77
pubg 13 :
I’d rather lose the Cristiano Ronaldo way than win the Messi way.
2026-07-08 06:22:17
190
To see more videos from user @s_mbappe, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
