@kdc_global7: EVEN PEOPLE SPORTYTV COULD NOT BELIEVE THE KIND OF ROBBERY THAT EGYPT SAW TODAY! They even confined that Argentina doesn’t need all this to win, If unfair to Egypt
Omoh I already lost interest in watching this world cup tournament 😕
2026-07-07 21:52:34
97
Kpesse Godwin ⚽🙏 :
Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo Ronaldo ❤️🩹❤️🩹❤️🩹❤️🩹
2026-07-07 22:59:57
3
eness_989 :
Football is clearly loosing its credibility and very soon football will just be valueless
2026-07-07 21:12:13
207
yasim Gizz :
why did they cancel Croatia goal now if it is fifa
2026-07-07 20:56:59
58
David Reddy :
bro i love you you are intelligent you are a good analyst please send your videos to kombo hes the one taking too much
2026-07-07 20:55:46
87
jamesbond :
I'm a Messi fan, but I have to ask: isn't Messi ashamed of himself? If you're the GOAT, why keep getting involved in incidents that make people question your sportsmanship? A player of his status should respect the rules and avoid actions that could seriously hurt another player.
That's one thing I respect about Ronaldo—he plays hard, but he accepts the rules of football. Messi should stop giving people reasons to question his conduct. As the greatest, your football should do the talking, not controversies.
2026-07-07 22:50:10
13
WILFRED :
Argentina is not winning the world cup though, they are yet to face a top nation
2026-07-07 21:32:35
28
TV1 israel :
2026-07-07 22:33:39
5
. :
Abeg where u watch dis podcast… make I go watch my self😅…. U no dey drop source?
This is the only way you can discredit Messi because football wise you can’t
2026-07-07 22:53:02
1
🕊️ 28TH🪖 REX :
12 videos from KDC just for this match bruh
2026-07-07 23:28:35
1
_tseps_ :
Right now no be we Ronaldo fans ohh Ebe the world 🤣
2026-07-07 22:55:20
1
Gõz pêl152 :
if na people comment u dey use console ur sef no problems😂😂
2026-07-07 23:42:23
0
Emperor jr💦💎🌴 :
@Omar Abdo: Incident 1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because:
1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase.
2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play.
Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because:
1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase.
2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez.
3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.
2026-07-07 22:24:01
5
KING 👑 ABU :
everywhere good bro one game people will leave the game for them to play alone 🥺
2026-07-07 21:02:16
11
LILOBLAQ 🇳🇬 🔥🔥 :
Omo Ajeh
2026-07-07 20:55:11
5
Kachi 🦅 ♍️ :
Omo💔
2026-07-07 20:51:44
5
Big Kenny💙❤️💙❤️ :
@King Byble: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because:
1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase.
2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play.
Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because:
1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase.
2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez.
3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.
2026-07-07 22:01:48
0
To see more videos from user @kdc_global7, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.