sufyanabuali5
Region: US
Tuesday 07 July 2026 20:59:34 GMT
148882
13422
357
8441
Music
Download
Comments
I :
They need to rematch
2026-07-08 08:33:02
87
🤴 :
It was FIFA Vs Egypt😔
2026-07-08 10:54:24
5
CAPTAIN🇬🇶 :
Man of the match
2026-07-07 23:35:02
1055
Mikaeel Bru :
it's fine France will beat Argentina
2026-07-08 08:41:24
162
Nothing_11 :
All though I like Messi, this shit was unfair 😔
2026-07-08 00:12:57
227
:
so the ref is good all game until they score lol😂
2026-07-08 10:58:32
1
Psk :
No fair that u sold a 2-0 lead😂😂😂😂
2026-07-08 10:11:12
14
Ahmad🇱🇧🃏 :
Egpyt should’ve won 😭
2026-07-08 09:32:45
8
Ibrahim :
The ref after the game
2026-07-08 07:56:51
44
zak :
Ye bro sorry I am Messi fan but ye true
2026-07-08 06:49:54
31
jasonap617 :
For you Ronaldo fans Incident 1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because: 1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase. 2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play. Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because: 1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase. 2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez. 3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.
2026-07-08 02:17:22
15
Javier😂 :
Switzerland please save football 🥹
2026-07-08 00:43:03
29
Alberto Angeles :
Both of thoses fouls were dives
2026-07-07 21:59:51
24
To see more videos from user @sufyanabuali5, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
