HM7
Region: EG
Tuesday 07 July 2026 21:53:59 GMT
172927
21194
303
3353
Music
Download
Comments
:
Incident 1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because: 1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase. 2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play. Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because: 1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase. 2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez. 3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.
2026-07-08 07:19:51
9
Bhavya Agarwal :
the salah one is out of context the defender first touched ball , next time watch games on television instead of tiktok
2026-07-08 12:19:09
1
𝕻𝖆𝕽𝖆𝕸 𓅓 :
Is Argentina the new Okc
2026-07-08 02:30:01
208
E💙♥️ :
Look and understand
2026-07-08 03:36:22
22
selimm :
12 vrs 11
2026-07-07 22:31:23
56
Xen :
Up 2-0 with 15 minutes left btw
2026-07-08 03:47:53
60
zayo._official :
so we ain't Gona talk about Portugal vs Croatia ✌
2026-07-08 04:19:17
22
Chris :
bye bye
2026-07-07 23:34:24
13
𝙱𝙷𝙰𝙽2 :
there's 0 point of watching football anymore 💔 as soon as messi is starting to lose they start to foul
2026-07-08 04:28:12
8
To see more videos from user @hmza7.ftbl, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
