Incident 1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because:
1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase.
2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play.
Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because:
1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase.
2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez.
3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.
2026-07-08 07:19:51
10
owen :
who we neded
2026-07-08 19:16:25
163
Erms123 :
Look and understand
2026-07-08 03:36:22
31
💤 :
u guys don't watch the match do u
2026-07-08 09:05:03
6
RF24 Crystal Palace :
Incident 1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because:
1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase.
2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play.
Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because:
1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase.
2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez.
3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.
2026-07-08 09:46:39
9
Nicu :
Anything but saying that they lost
2026-07-08 06:32:42
7
⚡𝗥𝗬𝗭𝗘𝗡⚡ :
they all know
2026-07-08 04:13:58
66
Gagine Yamal :
who want Argentina to win
2026-07-12 02:22:35
5
Ali :
2026-07-08 00:46:36
110
onlytime0409 :
Messi fans
2026-07-08 08:19:55
26
𝐏.𝐓𝐑 ⋆✞⋆ :
All match
2026-07-08 02:49:50
37
عزيز :
2026-07-07 23:34:51
115
ˢᵉˡⁱᵐ :
12 vrs 11
2026-07-07 22:31:23
68
zayo._official :
so we ain't Gona talk about Portugal vs Croatia ✌
2026-07-08 04:19:17
41
𝕾𝖙𝖔𝖐𝖘 :
Do we all agree now?
2026-07-08 11:00:36
11
zainab.mcr7 :
The fact they almost won shows how good they really are
2026-07-08 22:05:08
13
:
tell me i’m wrong
2026-07-08 08:48:29
13
Chris :
bye bye
2026-07-07 23:34:24
14
Dzuni.Ⓜ️ :
besides the fifa bs , how can you fumble a 2-0 lead in 15 min? 😳
2026-07-08 11:38:47
64
To see more videos from user @hmza7.ftbl, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.