Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because
1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase.
2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play.
Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because:
3. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase.
4. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez.
5. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.
2026-07-08 08:38:50
2
_9ddj :
flipped it in 14 minutes btw 😹
2026-07-08 01:10:39
35
💫𝓚17⚡️ :
They deserve the win 💔
2026-07-07 22:15:14
207
MVP :
At this point I'm waiting for Messi to retire so that football can be great again
2026-07-08 09:19:50
0
る :
I’m Japanese but I respected Egypt so much after this match. I think the whole world is impressed by Egypt performance and I feel bad for them
2026-07-08 01:51:16
10
Chef :
The decisions were pretty fair it’s just they were unlucky football is like that man I wanted Egypt to go through
2026-07-08 09:01:21
0
Marcus :
I'm a messi fan but honestly the ref was actually unfair...
2026-07-08 09:02:08
0
Catculer👻 :
still crying😔
2026-07-08 03:08:18
1
To see more videos from user @eyad.prdxz, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.