1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because:
1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase.
2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play.
Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because:
1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase.
2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez.
3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.
2026-07-08 04:33:12
80
Joe Pel Gh :
At this point nobody should argue with anyone
2026-07-08 03:11:29
346
OluwaTosin :
God bless u brother
i don follow u
2026-07-08 09:05:34
4
me :
Salah didnt even ask for a penalty after he lost the ball
2026-07-08 07:45:07
62
officialbabangida :
he touched the ball before the leg 🖤
2026-07-08 04:48:45
128
CHAMP 🎟️ :
I thank God everyday that I get to watch Messi play football in my generation
2026-07-08 02:38:20
102
Keamogetswe Jan :
the defender won the ball . then when he tried to rush to the ball he then tripped Salah. so they cant put a penalty since he won the ball first
@Lolloross999: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because:
1. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play.
.
Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because:
1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase.
2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez.
3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.
2026-07-08 08:57:42
2
𝒮𝒽𝒶𝒹𝒹𝓎_442 :
God bless you bro
2026-07-08 02:56:30
4
BadMan AG :
Thank you for addressing this bro 🙏❤️
2026-07-07 22:47:21
4
ruyken mchelsea🇰🇪🇰🇪 :
Thank you very much
2026-07-07 22:24:28
3
Realdunga :
Pls I have this type of mic shure sd7b but I don’t know how to set it up and I also have my 4th generation 2i2 sound card
2026-07-08 08:20:31
1
Collins Twobar :
lol.. Salah was already on his way down from the first challenge which was a clean tackle
2026-07-08 02:28:20
3
Kokuvi Studios :
How are you able to flow sensibly and effortlessly like that bruh…I have followed you
2026-07-08 02:04:58
2
To see more videos from user @harrybanana_z, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.