Elksreacts
Region: GB
Tuesday 07 July 2026 22:13:46 GMT
128339
18933
502
934
Music
Download
Comments
Peder :
Can't believe fifa scored 2 headers and a volley 🙏
2026-07-08 00:39:12
4332
.peters :
“Losing team player expresses frustration over the loss” unheard of 😭
2026-07-08 05:15:48
364
. :
They fumbled a 2-0 lead ofcourse he’s gonna say it’s rigged😭
2026-07-08 07:50:32
0
Optimus Prime. :
Can’t believe fifa told Egypt to fumble a 2-0 lead
2026-07-08 06:01:56
117
miles_morgs :
ronaldo fans
2026-07-07 22:17:40
3612
Cameron :
im so glad im finally on the side of the internet that isnt mindlessly hating
2026-07-08 05:39:22
79
Mason :
It’s crazy how y’all don’t notice how Di Maria has been carrying Argentina throughout this tournament.
2026-07-08 06:55:49
22
mohammed_ibz :
Couldn’t defend a two goal lead with 10 mins to go
2026-07-07 22:17:58
3135
James :
Average Ronaldo fan
2026-07-08 07:42:11
9
Success&Motivation :
How can a game be rigged if your team conceded 3 goals😂
2026-07-08 04:45:42
168
beefy bee :
Just show him Modric saying the same thing about the Portugal game, and that's a big name player saying it not some random.
2026-07-07 23:36:35
194
Ohhdamian :
so if a player says its saying its rigged it must be rigged right? someone remind me what modric said after his game 😂
2026-07-08 01:49:40
59
king.1jkehi4 :
Modric said the same thing about Portugal
2026-07-07 22:35:42
129
:
i'm a Messi fan and the ref was objectively not fair ngl
2026-07-08 03:17:38
6
MarvzRas :
Too much talk from the fans of a player that got his red card suspended, something that never happened before in the history of the game.
2026-07-07 22:38:20
680
Timothy Castagne :
why would it be rigged when ronaldo is more popular more rich and makes more money for fifa tell me m8
2026-07-08 07:19:51
10
Rahman :
Incident 1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because: 1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase. 2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play. Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because: 1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase. 2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez. 3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.
2026-07-08 05:02:26
45
Nilovine :
I would say that too if I lose a 2 goal lead 😂😂
2026-07-08 01:53:50
23
To see more videos from user @elksreacts, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
