Referee Channel
Region: SE
Tuesday 07 July 2026 23:29:39 GMT
211993
11725
559
3436
Music
Download
Comments
Woolf :
Salah lost the ball, PERIOD.
2026-07-08 03:42:56
416
Max :
He touched the ball first, so its not a foul on Salah 😄
2026-07-08 06:53:41
217
Changamire :
but the inconsistency is whats wrong.
2026-07-08 09:03:57
0
Hot Summer :
Ronaldo fans arguing with everyone now
2026-07-08 05:45:29
636
Bl4z3 :
a tackle is a tackle .. now we are measuring by how SOFT it was? where is the metric?
2026-07-07 23:40:21
278
بلبل :
but it was exact the same tackle on argentina
2026-07-08 03:04:34
17
Khutso Kirchoff Balo :
Lol they called you to make an analysis on this one, now that you have they are questioning you😭
2026-07-08 05:49:06
53
JexterDaMagician :
He touched the ball first
2026-07-08 08:46:30
5
glen :
My question iiis How can you bottle a clean 2-0 goal lead at 78th minute
2026-07-08 08:01:22
10
DecentGhostXbox1 :
Got the ball first and Salah dived after
2026-07-08 00:24:38
218
༺Kıʟʟєя༻ :
louder ref..
2026-07-08 09:25:43
1
FOOTBALL CONNER :
it is never a foul
2026-07-08 05:26:50
9
Martin Luther kim :
very correct Alvarez never fouled Salah he won the ball first.
2026-07-08 07:43:43
5
barcelonafan12 :
if anyone believe it's a pen it's so crazy the contact was the smallest ever he dived in the air bro
2026-07-08 09:06:04
1
Samxyskillz1 :
See it this way, Salah lost the ball to Alvarez, Alvarez is now on the move, Salah is the one in his way, not the other way round. It's simple common sense. Not every contact in the box leads to a penalty, Salah shouldn't have lost the ball in the first place.
2026-07-08 08:07:40
3
samuelnyombi485 :
All contacts were very light and VAR shouldn’t have intervened in the dis allowed goal for Egypt
2026-07-08 06:43:53
0
dre :
But the mistake step on litcha wasn’t too soft no?
2026-07-07 23:33:01
65
Matimu.₩ :
use a video not pictures next time unc
2026-07-08 06:33:25
7
∂ƒιχ @256🇺🇬🇦🇷🇿🇦 :
Egypt was leading 2-0 until the 78th minute. The referee was good, VAR was good, FIFA was good too! But in the 79th minute Argentina scored, then made a great comeback and won the match— wow! Suddenly the referee was bad, VAR was bad. Smh... an
2026-07-08 06:42:17
5
DOSTED 💰💰 :
they told us this wasn't a foul that is how the world is
2026-07-08 09:12:11
6
useruser :
Notice how he didn’t mention any rules regarding “light contact / too soft”. This makes it subjective on what contact / tackle is considered a foul. And that leads to the main issue, soft fouls are called for Argentina..If you ever played you know the Argentina foul was too soft also
2026-07-08 02:43:23
5
Leito :
it's not penalty. people in football don't know the rules or what
2026-07-08 07:29:34
10
伊德里斯 :
1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because: 1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase. 2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play. Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because: 1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase. 2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez. 3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.
2026-07-08 07:54:23
11
To see more videos from user @refereechannel, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
