@sports.flock: Did Egypt get robbed? #egypt #rigged #fifaworldcup2026 #sportsflock #futbol⚽️

sportsszn
sportsszn
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Wednesday 08 July 2026 00:23:00 GMT
972193
191090
1421
53426

Music

Download

Comments

forgotten_maestro1
@realcomfort :
Scored 3 goal in 15 minutes btw
2026-07-08 03:33:37
11483
saifvision5
Saif🇾🇪 :
Even some Messi fans have know it
2026-07-08 03:57:07
4333
univers3.fvx
𝟑𝟏𝟐.𝐔𝐍𝐈𝐕𝐄𝐑𝐒𝟑 :
i think we can all agree sports have been ruined.
2026-07-08 05:29:38
1667
landism20
🏄🏽‍♂️ᏝᏗᏁᎴᎥᏕ🏄🏽‍♂️ :
Yes it was a foul, but the fact the referee allowed them to play on and then proceeded to call it back is a horrible call and also it didn’t lead to a direct goal either the moment Egypt got possession to the moment they scored was 16 seconds completely horrible call
2026-07-08 01:09:40
2644
eliana_wonderland
🎶Eli🎶 :
Game was so bad that I went from being a Messi fan to a Ronaldo fan
2026-07-08 06:07:39
242
.yassin.y.m
Yassin🥷🏼 :
2026-07-08 02:52:57
582
blazinho2alt
blazinho2alt :
He hit the ball the salah tripped on him stop going against Argentina
2026-07-08 01:31:56
109
ssshakurrr
⚡ :
AND then they allowed TWO fouls that would've result in a penalty which happened in the lead to Argentina's last goal
2026-07-08 08:40:16
4
johnmang1235
Nice † :
I feel you Zico..I feel you💔
2026-07-08 08:28:56
1
zeglusk22
(っ◔◡◔)っ Leo :
buddy even if it was 3-0 it would have become 3-3 and argentina would most likely win anyway😭✌️
2026-07-08 05:46:31
5
owainapp
owainapp :
Lost the cup, won the world
2026-07-08 07:09:22
61
lakritaoma
LakritaOma :
bro you a streamer stick to streaming bro just started watching football in 2026
2026-07-08 06:55:03
8
ayeshi_26
𑣲𝑨 :
Incident 1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because: 1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase. 2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play. Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because: 1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase. 2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez. 3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.
2026-07-08 06:46:31
7
rahman3hoo3s
￴ ￴￴￴ ￴ ￴￴￴ ￴￴ :
ts made me mad
2026-07-08 00:33:25
47
To see more videos from user @sports.flock, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos


About