@hanlonman10vamos: Egypt actually robbed Argentina instead #Soccer #football #worldcup #argentina #messi

Q♡Z :

how many people love this man

flashback :

How about the offside goal Romero scored

꧁Aᴰᵞᴬᴺ Gᴬᴹᴵᴺᴳ꧂ :

Incident 1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because: 1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase. 2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play. Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because: 1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase. 2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez. 3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.

🤍ＰＲＩＭＥ VIDEOS 🐐💞 :

I know we all love messi … But this is not a fair decision…

Yusupiddin :

Bro that was not goal it was dissalowed

Tumza de boy :

the referee said it was a foul after var check

Rele :

what about the penalty of salah🤔

Era of DOMINATION ❤️ :

your making noise

2033 :

Btw am ur biggest fan

Kokushibo :

Incident 1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because: 1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase. 2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play. Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because: 1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase. 2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez. 3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.

_zoRdaX_⁉️ :

I think he watch it from nokia

Onkel Gabi :

bring his analysis on the build up to Argentina 3rd goal too

Russian Rodgers :

he has multiple videos pertaining that game stop chasing for attention

🧃🐐🇦🇷 :

DY LOWKEY🚀 :

I love messi

🧃🐐🇦🇷 :

𝄞 :

THE REF LITERALLY SAID PLAY ON WYM A FOUL , IF YOU CANT REF THEN DONT REF