simply_him00🧪
Region: ZA
Wednesday 08 July 2026 08:20:33 GMT
71541
14972
135
2866
Music
Download
Comments
2乃尺ㄖズ乇刀🧟♂️ :
coz Ronaldo lost is crazy bro never compare Ronaldo to Messi ever again
2026-07-08 13:07:27
7
ryousatified2 :
Just cause they lost😂
2026-07-08 11:14:46
53
one_beleif :
im lwk wearing an Argentina jersy rn
2026-07-08 09:41:32
32
rosiey✗ˑ𝘰 :
As an African I was fully behind Egypt though 😌
2026-07-08 09:31:09
74
:
Yall mad?
2026-07-08 11:38:38
0
perk0000 :
😁
2026-07-08 11:53:18
2
GXS 🇿🇦 :
Y'all salty asl😭💔
2026-07-08 13:51:58
0
vvs.mk^🦢 :
would this be a conversation if it was portugal instead of Argentina?
2026-07-08 15:34:40
2
: :
Since you guys don’t understand football😭 let me explain the ref disregard the things you believe were fouls Incident 1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because: 1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase. 2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play. Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because: 1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase. 2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez. 3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.
2026-07-08 13:31:42
4
To see more videos from user @simply_him00, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
