Edits
Region: AU
Wednesday 08 July 2026 09:10:16 GMT
53280
4398
240
393
Music
Download
Comments
Thokk :
immediate unrepost
2026-07-08 11:21:17
1
𝙈𝙍𝙏𝙓.𝙖𝙚𝙥 :
even the biggest edit acc know ball🙏🙏 W
2026-07-08 12:07:54
7
:
not rude but every country deserves the win
2026-07-08 09:13:52
30
𝐈𝐥𝐢𝐚𝐬 ✞ :
Fifas Princess
2026-07-08 09:57:42
23
:
you don't know this squad
2026-07-08 11:12:02
8
joks_laugh :
yes scripted for pepsi
2026-07-08 09:58:36
6
NEX1 :
сын фифы
2026-07-08 09:31:02
30
coze :
fifa's bae
2026-07-08 10:41:12
1
M L K :
L edit
2026-07-08 11:05:29
7
Troxyy :
The scrip is even better than the last wc
2026-07-08 10:08:29
6
CoDeX :
Incident 1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because: 1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase. 2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play. Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because: 1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase. 2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez. 3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.
2026-07-08 11:03:25
5
Bowser jr :
this ratio is going to win😭✌️
2026-07-08 10:12:58
4
To see more videos from user @edits, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
