γοтєκυσ :
рекомендую всем перевести и прочитать это, прежде чем сразу обвинять в пдфилизме (Although Nabokov expressed criticism of both Freud and Kinsey, it appears that he studied their
works. Early in his psychological research, Freud noted the high incidence of child sexual abuse in his patients
and rightly concluded that it was a source of trauma. However, he went on to construct their accounts as fantasy,
on the presumption that ―surely, such widespread perversions against children are not very probable‖ (Masson
1985, 267). Freud thus shifted the locus of pathology from the abuser to the victim. The entry of the
Freudian perspective to Western culture was accompanied by the idea of the child as an active sexual being. As
Kincaid (1998, 15) commented ―(Freud) smoothed the way […] (by) conceiving of infancy in terms of
stark sexual drives […] If we posit openly that children are activated by sexual energy, the evasive screens
necessary for eroticizing them disappear.‖
At the time Lolita was written, there had been very little systematic research into child sexual abuse.
American sex researcher Alfred Kinsey‘s 1948 report ―Sexual Behavior in the Human Male‖ received massive
publicity at the time that Nabokov was developing his novel. One of Kinsey‘s influential ―findings‖ was that
adult-child sexual contact is unlikely to cause appreciable harm and that any harm to the child from such activity
usually results from a sexually repressed society‘s inappropriate response (Jones2004, 752). In fact, Kinsey
falsely presented as separate cases the activities of a single man who had sex with over 300 children (Tate
1998).Eric Goldman (2004) observes ―While Freud is a palpable presence in Lolita, Nabokov also clearly had in
mind more recent studies of female sexuality that involved statistical analysis of kinds of sexual behavior, such
as the Kinsey reports…‖ (70).)
2026-07-11 09:14:21