1. Home
  2. Detail

@foodland.official23: Fresh Watermelon Slices 🍉🔪 . 📍ตลาดนัด กกท (Ramkhamhaeng Night Market), Bangkok, Thailand #foodland #asmr #fruit

Food Land
Food Land
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Friday 10 July 2026 14:02:13 GMT
49386
621
4
13

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (14.78MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (16.64MB) Watermark .mp4 (0MB) Music .mp3

Comments

astroboy_.07
🀄 ASTROBOYS™ :
pertama dapet apa nih
2026-07-10 14:20:37
2
luke4runner
Dream :
I must treat myself to a mouthwatering watermelon very soon 🙂
2026-07-12 22:03:22
0
yveidn
Komentator :
2026-07-12 11:56:37
0
halinqlbuid
Gieo Duyên Phật Pháp 🙏🙏🙏 :
Xin Phật A Di Đà Cho Con Về Tây Phương Cực Lạc - Nguyện Kiếp Này Vãng Sanh Về Cõi Tịnh Độ Của Ngài ! NAM MÔ A DI ĐÀ PHẬT NAM MÔ A DI ĐÀ PHẬT NAM MÔ A DI ĐÀ PHẬT 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
2026-07-11 05:56:57
0
To see more videos from user @foodland.official23, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

HAPPY NEW MONTH NOVEMBER, LET'S PRAY INTO THE MONTH TOGETHER 🙏🥰 #newmonth #fyp #creatorsearchinsights #inkedpraises #christiantiktok
HAPPY NEW MONTH NOVEMBER, LET'S PRAY INTO THE MONTH TOGETHER 🙏🥰 #newmonth #fyp #creatorsearchinsights #inkedpraises #christiantiktok
A major legal setback has hit President Donald Trump after a federal judge permanently dismissed his $10 billion defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal, its parent company, and media billionaire Rupert Murdoch. On October 31, 2026, US District Judge Darrin Gayles ruled that Trump failed to establish the legal standard known as actual malice, which requires public figures to demonstrate that a publisher knowingly published false information or acted with reckless disregard for the truth. The lawsuit originated from a July 2025 Wall Street Journal investigation concerning a sexually suggestive birthday letter allegedly bearing Trump’s name. The letter was reportedly included in a collection assembled for Jeffrey Epstein’s 50th birthday in 2003, with Ghislaine Maxwell involved in collecting contributions. Trump denied writing the letter and accused the newspaper of publishing false and defamatory material. He subsequently demanded $10 billion in damages, arguing that the reporting damaged his reputation. But Judge Gayles was not persuaded by the revised lawsuit. Describing Trump’s legal arguments as “grasping at straws,” the judge concluded that the amended complaint failed to establish actual malice. Importantly, the judge did not determine whether Trump actually authored the disputed letter. The decision concerned whether the lawsuit sufficiently demonstrated that the newspaper knowingly or recklessly published false information. The case had already been dismissed once in April 2026, but Trump was allowed to submit an amended complaint. This latest ruling dismisses it with prejudice, meaning the same lawsuit cannot simply be filed again. The decision represents a significant legal setback in Trump’s confrontation with major American media organizations. It also highlights the constitutional protections journalists enjoy when reporting on public figures, even when their reporting becomes the subject of high-profile legal battles. Trump’s legal team has indicated that it intends to continue pursuing the fight. THE BIGGER QUESTION: As the controversy surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s connections to powerful individuals continues, the dispute over transparency, investigative journalism and presidential accountability remains far from settled. #Trump #JeffreyEpstein #WallStreetJournal #RupertMurdoch #PressFreedom
A major legal setback has hit President Donald Trump after a federal judge permanently dismissed his $10 billion defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal, its parent company, and media billionaire Rupert Murdoch. On October 31, 2026, US District Judge Darrin Gayles ruled that Trump failed to establish the legal standard known as actual malice, which requires public figures to demonstrate that a publisher knowingly published false information or acted with reckless disregard for the truth. The lawsuit originated from a July 2025 Wall Street Journal investigation concerning a sexually suggestive birthday letter allegedly bearing Trump’s name. The letter was reportedly included in a collection assembled for Jeffrey Epstein’s 50th birthday in 2003, with Ghislaine Maxwell involved in collecting contributions. Trump denied writing the letter and accused the newspaper of publishing false and defamatory material. He subsequently demanded $10 billion in damages, arguing that the reporting damaged his reputation. But Judge Gayles was not persuaded by the revised lawsuit. Describing Trump’s legal arguments as “grasping at straws,” the judge concluded that the amended complaint failed to establish actual malice. Importantly, the judge did not determine whether Trump actually authored the disputed letter. The decision concerned whether the lawsuit sufficiently demonstrated that the newspaper knowingly or recklessly published false information. The case had already been dismissed once in April 2026, but Trump was allowed to submit an amended complaint. This latest ruling dismisses it with prejudice, meaning the same lawsuit cannot simply be filed again. The decision represents a significant legal setback in Trump’s confrontation with major American media organizations. It also highlights the constitutional protections journalists enjoy when reporting on public figures, even when their reporting becomes the subject of high-profile legal battles. Trump’s legal team has indicated that it intends to continue pursuing the fight. THE BIGGER QUESTION: As the controversy surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s connections to powerful individuals continues, the dispute over transparency, investigative journalism and presidential accountability remains far from settled. #Trump #JeffreyEpstein #WallStreetJournal #RupertMurdoch #PressFreedom
Yo solo veo, veo... . . . #jbalvin #bobo #fypage #musikviral #ponmeenparati
Yo solo veo, veo... . . . #jbalvin #bobo #fypage #musikviral #ponmeenparati
@Brandi … I am looking at you. #snitchesgetstitches
@Brandi … I am looking at you. #snitchesgetstitches
Me ferrei amigos, e amigas😂 usem muito #estevam #meferrei
Me ferrei amigos, e amigas😂 usem muito #estevam #meferrei
😎 #fyp #foryoupage #viral
😎 #fyp #foryoupage #viral

About

Legal