Mr. Philosoraptor
Region: US
Friday 10 July 2026 17:28:08 GMT
266919
25404
792
1535
Music
Download
Comments
✝️4rtt._🇻🇦 :
Fyp thinks I understand shi😭✌️
2026-07-11 00:38:27
6404
Mieszko I :
Yeah, f(x)=2x²+7x-1 or something 😭✌️
2026-07-11 06:30:48
2411
el loco simon :
{-B±√(B²-4.A.C)}:2.A or sum shi
2026-07-12 06:34:53
1
Eyad :
Nobody understands so i’m right
2026-07-10 21:20:40
1101
Moidpedorapist21 :
I genuinely thought u were responding to her by the dinosaur
2026-07-11 22:56:57
1
🇦🇱 :
God exists
2026-07-10 23:17:27
1310
PaperDynamics :
"i used formal logic so im right"
2026-07-10 18:06:01
1882
Rafapoopy :
slow DOWN bro
2026-07-11 08:21:31
0
noc :
Just typing shit 😭
2026-07-11 05:16:30
177
User_Name_Taken_ :
I also try to look smart by making massive walls of text that no one will bother to read because I only give them 1 second to read each of them and just hope people see big wall of text=correct
2026-07-10 21:40:14
997
DogwithHair🪖🪓 :
well 3-62)81&@=+2%77%])*+[)982#97#981#1😡
2026-07-10 19:42:39
516
Catholic🇻🇦 :
btw the argument itself makes no sense
2026-07-10 17:33:27
706
Josh :
The earth is not 6000 years old, end of argument.
2026-07-11 06:22:53
20
ultrainstinctglazers :
yeah yeah A + B = C😭✌
2026-07-11 09:18:36
21
Habassourdie :
Read every frame, at frame 4 you’re supposed to use the liar’s paradox in natural language as it is a semantic paradox however you also use Godel to say that your argument can’t be proven in a system without a semantic paradox😅 Therefore applying that to such a concept like divine omniscience is a TOTAL non sequitur fallacy as divine omniscience isn’t limited by probability in a formal system like PA, God knows semantics truth not only merely theorems😅
2026-07-11 07:50:58
93
lebryn :
Basically the girl's argument is: if I say "an omniscient being can't know this sentence" and they know it, then they're not omniscient. While the guy is saying: you can't disprove omniscience by using a broken, enclosed system that auto-references itself, jumping straight to "God can't be omniscient" is an unjustified leap in logic, as the original statement doesn't even have a stable correct conclusion
2026-07-11 22:47:16
22
TueCled :
Spam vs Skill
2026-07-10 20:44:04
40
Liam :
Thought of this when i was 8 btw
2026-07-11 20:09:53
7
♰ 𝙡𝙪𝙠𝙚𝙤𝙣𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙨𝙮𝙮 ♰ :
I read his argument yesterday and refuted it pretty easily but didn't want to post anything less than an essay even tho it's just a variation of a liars paradox, moots?
2026-07-10 17:45:01
110
U.KM.PR :
fyp thinks I read 😂😂😂
2026-07-11 06:03:28
5
To see more videos from user @therationalanimal, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
