@rottenw1nter: ik martin would love this song if he knew it | if this flops i might actually cry bc i love this edit and i dont even know why #cortis #martinedwards #martin #targetaudience #martincortis

sage
sage
Open In TikTok:
Region: ES
Friday 10 July 2026 19:59:51 GMT
83064
25153
75
1453

Music

Download

Comments

lucidbles
lui :
yo creo q si nos organizamos todos para decirle a martin q escuche soda stereo lo conseguimos
2026-07-11 18:40:36
926
quin.mafyy
Maferr :
Amo este video, Martin queda perfecto con Soda Stereo💗💗
2026-07-12 06:32:29
7
xx._z09
𝓯🪷 :
No puedo parar de ver este edit🥹🥹🥹
2026-07-12 00:12:08
19
myxx.ppp
nose :
amiga haces Argentina
2026-07-31 22:03:28
8
senoscayokeonhoodelacama
(˶˃𐃷˂˶) :
no hay chance de que si supiera sobre soda stereo no los escuche
2026-07-13 00:07:16
58
cinna_angel8
Seraphine :
Es totalmente mi tipooooo
2026-07-12 23:07:25
7
wxxda1
cam_ii :
2026-07-11 19:38:36
2
81z.cortis
polly ★ :
tengo una conexión espiritual con este edit
2026-07-29 05:00:27
2
To see more videos from user @rottenw1nter, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

To ‘sealion’ somebody is to enter a conversation and demand they provide a definition, justification, or proof for every single thing they say. But it is not done from good faith, but it is used as a weapon to exhaust the other person. They might frame it as politeness. They might say it is from genuine curiosity, but they are trying to wear you down. And so they will say, ‘Where is the proof?’ for every single thing you say until you give up.  The idea goes back to a 2014 webcomic by David Malki, but the technique is ancient. It is there in Aristotle, 2500 years ago.  In his book Sophistic Refutations, Aristotle catalogues all of ‘the tricks of the sophists,’ which are techniques which make it look like you are trying to understand when you are only actually trying to win a debate. And one such trick is when somebody demands an endless stream of definitions. You say something quite clearly, and they ask you to define your term. And so, you do define it. But then they ask you to define the terms within your terms until you go on and on, until the sophist declares that you know nothing at all.  And Aristotle said that we are under no obligation to answer some of these questions, especially when those questions are not given in good faith, because some questions are a form of manipulation, and knowing when to dodge, or not answering, is as important as knowing how to argue.  Because what Aristotle understood — and the internet clearly shows — is that some requests for dialogue are not genuine. Some people ask questions not because they want to understand, but because they use those questions like rocks in a catapult, and they only want to batter you down.
To ‘sealion’ somebody is to enter a conversation and demand they provide a definition, justification, or proof for every single thing they say. But it is not done from good faith, but it is used as a weapon to exhaust the other person. They might frame it as politeness. They might say it is from genuine curiosity, but they are trying to wear you down. And so they will say, ‘Where is the proof?’ for every single thing you say until you give up. The idea goes back to a 2014 webcomic by David Malki, but the technique is ancient. It is there in Aristotle, 2500 years ago. In his book Sophistic Refutations, Aristotle catalogues all of ‘the tricks of the sophists,’ which are techniques which make it look like you are trying to understand when you are only actually trying to win a debate. And one such trick is when somebody demands an endless stream of definitions. You say something quite clearly, and they ask you to define your term. And so, you do define it. But then they ask you to define the terms within your terms until you go on and on, until the sophist declares that you know nothing at all. And Aristotle said that we are under no obligation to answer some of these questions, especially when those questions are not given in good faith, because some questions are a form of manipulation, and knowing when to dodge, or not answering, is as important as knowing how to argue. Because what Aristotle understood — and the internet clearly shows — is that some requests for dialogue are not genuine. Some people ask questions not because they want to understand, but because they use those questions like rocks in a catapult, and they only want to batter you down.

About