@meghannmcuniff: The judge in Tyler Robinson's preliminary hearing banned the courtroom camera from displaying exhibits after Robinson's note to his roommate appeared on camera in violation of a court order. Judge Tony F. Graf Jr. issued the order today (Friday, July 10) after Robinson's lawyers requested he probated any further broadcast of Robinson's preliminary hearing. It applied only to one witness because the hearing is now over. Attorneys will file briefs this summer and return to court on Sept. 1 for argument. Robinson's lawyer Richard Novak cited an earlier violation of the court order regarding camera angles that occurred in a pre-trial conference. "This is the second time that the court's orders concerning the scope of electronic media coverage have been violated. I'm a baseball fan, and I just don't think the court needs to wait for the third strike," said Novak, who is based in Pasadena, California. The mistake occurred during the testimony of Sgt. Jennifer Faumuina of the Utah Department of Public Safety. Judge Graf earlier ruled that a handwritten note that investigators say Robinson left for his roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs, could be shown in open court but not broadcast. The camera operator showed the note for a couple seconds then panned away, but Novak observed that the electronic era means the note has been widely shared through screenshots and is now permanently public. Judge Graf agreed his order had been violated but declined to ban broadcasting completely as Novak first requested. The judge granted Novak's secondary request to prohibit the broadcasting of exhibits. "Effective immediately, members of the media shall no longer capture or broadcast any exhibits displayed by the parties during today's proceedings. The court finds this sanction to be proportional and appropriate in light of the violation of the court's prior order," Graf said. The sanction does not apply to the Sept. 1 hearing, for which the judge said he has not received broadcast requests. This clip has been edited for brevity. You can watch the entire discussion on my YouTube channel and Facebook page. #law #crime #court

Meghann Cuniff
Meghann Cuniff
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Friday 10 July 2026 20:11:23 GMT
73532
1184
127
14

Music

Download

Comments

woodguy34
woodguy :
They don’t want the public to see how circumstantial the evidence is.
2026-07-10 23:12:00
128
myquekunte
myquekunte :
Showing it here
2026-07-10 20:21:55
212
demdubbspvt
Jdubs :
This is such a cluster. This pre-trial is a mess and would not be allowed to go forward with the evidence currently shown in any other case.
2026-07-10 20:53:32
125
mathematical.intuition
Boring Old Guy :
That letter was shown months ago though
2026-07-10 21:33:50
32
ti_dub
Umber :
What is the rationale of prevent the public from seeing evidence in a public trial?
2026-07-10 23:32:48
14
k013334
k :
Stop allowing filming in court! Unnecessary and totally prejudicial
2026-07-11 01:58:00
2
b_boleyn
b_boleyn :
I remember being able to watch the entirety of the OJ Simpson trial, showing evidence testimonies and all sorts of things, what's different about this? Am I missing something?
2026-07-11 04:46:55
9
robplant7676
Shadowgeist7676👻🧠 :
Same judge that silenced Reckless Ben without hearing his side.
2026-07-10 21:56:59
28
queennoir38
Queen Bunny :
If this is a pre trial, who agreed to let cameras in???
2026-07-11 08:42:14
0
user72192843381392
user72192843381392 :
maritime law?
2026-07-11 00:58:34
1
capyapril
April :
It’s just a bunch of slices
2026-07-10 22:28:33
0
impostorparagon
paragon :
unconstitutional
2026-07-11 05:27:12
0
shyang_777
Shyang777 :
He's right!! It's a Prem hearing ...Trial hasn't started yet 🙄🙄🙄
2026-07-10 22:52:40
4
knicknackpaddywack81
❌️Richard❌️ :
gotta love transparency
2026-07-11 00:49:03
1
iwasthere2001
iwasthere2001 :
That letter was already available
2026-07-10 23:15:14
1
pure.immanence
pure immanence :
We already knew the contents of this letter, why can’t we see it??
2026-07-11 00:19:30
0
cenotes101
Crystal :
thank you algorithm for FINALLY bring me back to your exact page! I love the way you are presenting the important things
2026-07-11 04:22:23
0
zlildem0n
Dem0n🇺🇲 :
Welcome to when a amendment and a law conflict with each other
2026-07-11 00:32:15
0
kristi22777
Kristi :
Uhhh.. then why did they show it??? Literally did that on purpose. This entire thing is a joke
2026-07-11 00:19:37
7
debrasexton4
Debra Sexton935 :
mistrial
2026-07-11 00:13:27
0
trav.bart
T-Rav Bart :
another violation of my 1st Amendment
2026-07-11 03:09:19
0
daadfenshmirtz
CHIEFWIGGUM :
soooooo the cover up is happening now?????
2026-07-10 21:30:15
12
htownpipedreams
Pipedreams :
How are we feeling about the judge? I can’t tell if I like or hate him
2026-07-10 20:17:32
7
vverkmeister
VVerkmeister :
Mind you, the lawyers put that up when they weren't supposed to. They have a list of exhibits, and that one wasnt on the list. They WANTED to get the media out.
2026-07-10 22:03:20
13
To see more videos from user @meghannmcuniff, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos


About