@thebiblicalroots: THE MATT 5:17–18 PROBLEM: Did you know there’s a very popular interpretation of Matthew 5 that actually requires Christians to still be offering animal sacrifices for their sins today? That might sound shocking—but it's the unavoidable implication of a common interpretation of Jesus’ words in Matthew 5:17–18: "Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill… until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass from the Law until all is accomplished" (Matthew 5:17–18) In this short video, we examine Jesus' words in Matthew 5 alongside Hebrews 7–10 to see how Christ fulfilled the Law and why His once-for-all sacrifice changed everything. #bibleverse #matthew5 #theology #apologetics

The Biblical Roots
The Biblical Roots
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Saturday 11 July 2026 20:58:05 GMT
1193
90
14
4

Music

Download

Comments

timothysauder8
Timothy Sauder :
I wish you Americans would learn English language a word ending in s like Jesus Moses James is plural and it's singular form and you guys keep adding apostrophe in another s. I'm Canadian I taught English second language and took English in university.
2026-07-11 23:38:38
1
319dan
Dan Radig :
the argument against the law still being in place is by far my favorite. a change in the priesthood necessitates a change in the law. beyond that the new covenant is better than the old
2026-07-11 21:34:36
1
antmanski2
antmanski :
MY personal opinion is that He was serious when referring to the time we shall worship in spirit.
2026-07-11 21:05:43
1
georgegaskell34
gman :
The Law remains in God's Word. That does not mean it's still to be enforced. It remains in the Bible today...but for other reasons
2026-07-11 21:51:42
0
nacho_green2.0
Nacho_green2.0 :
What if they didn’t end but they moved because Jesus becoming our high priest shows a change “Move” from physical to spiritual for now and the prophets show it resumes in the kingdom? Ezekiel 40:38-43
2026-07-11 22:06:02
0
jerryford2000
Jerryford2000 :
Amen, JESUS IS LORD...
2026-07-11 21:23:49
0
russell.young09
Russell Young :
Jesus was the fulfillment of the Law.🥰
2026-07-11 22:21:10
0
frankgon849
Primo :
Jesus Christ fulfilled the law but we’re in a new covenant now
2026-07-12 00:25:41
0
halchaffee
Hal Chaffee :
Amen
2026-07-11 22:30:09
0
44walker7
44Walker :
Respectfully, I think you're combining things Scripture keeps separate. Hebrews explicitly tells us what Christ fulfilled: the Levitical priesthood, the temple ministry, and the sacrificial system. Those pointed directly to Him as the once-for-all sacrifice. That's why we no longer offer animal sacrifices. But where does Hebrews ever say the fourth commandment was abolished? Where does it say pigs became clean? Where does it say God reversed Leviticus 11? It doesn't. Jesus didn't say, "Some commandments will quietly disappear after My resurrection." He said, "Until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass from the Law until all is accomplished." (Matthew 5:18) Well... has heaven and earth passed away? Has Christ already returned? Are we living in the New Heaven and New Earth? Has death been destroyed? Are we already with Christ in eternity? Obviously not. So "all is accomplished" cannot mean everything in God's plan was completed at the cross. His sacrifice was finished, but His redemptive plan isn't complete until His return and the renewal of creation. The Ten Commandments weren't shadows pointing to Christ's sacrifice. "Do not murder," "Do not commit adultery," "Do not steal," and "Remember the Sabbath day" are God's moral commands. The fourth commandment sits among the other nine. Show me where God removed only that one. If your position is correct, the burden isn't on me to prove God never changed it. The burden is on you to show where God actually changed it. Hebrews plainly says sacrifices ended because Christ fulfilled them. It never plainly says the Sabbath ended or that unclean animals became food. I'm not willing to build doctrine on implications when God's commandments were given in plain words. Show me the verse where God explicitly changes them, and I'll gladly believe it. Until then, I'd rather obey God's clear commands than assume He silently reversed them.
2026-07-11 21:44:53
2
humble.heart2
Humble Heart :
not without a temple.
2026-07-11 21:11:17
1
anselmaule
Ansel Maule :
Jesus was the fulfillment of the LAW and Prophets, Jesus was likened unto them, they were a shadow of Jesus Christ all who doesn't listen to the Prophet Jesus Christ would be cut off from among the people, the son of man being revealed, the penality for sin was death, the death burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ, the Kingsman Redeemer, under the blood of bulls and goats, sin was only covered, the Law was a schoolmaster, it only pointed man as a sinner, it man a prisoner, they were in Dreamland waiting for the blood of Christ to stone for their sins, there was no mercy 🙏
2026-07-11 23:09:46
0
lairdwellness
Laird Wellness :
There’s no temple! Cant do sacrifice without a temple. There are many different sacrifices. He (Jesus) was the sacrifice for Sin… not the others. But fact remains. No temple. It would be sin to sacrifice outside the temple. They sacrificed until 70 ce. Paul paid for 4 to complete the Nazarite vows which included sacrifice.
2026-07-11 23:27:49
0
yellowstoneranch692
Yellowstone Ranch 1969 :
Heaven and Earth is a Jewish idiom for Jerusalem Temple. Since the Jerusalem Temple was destroyed in 70 A.D., the Mosaic Law is no longer binding on believers (Galatians).
2026-07-11 23:06:08
0
To see more videos from user @thebiblicalroots, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos


About