@laughterinlight: LAST DAY TODAY 7/13/2026. Please go to the link 🔗 at the top of my Linktree to leave a public comment for the OMB to help stop their proposed rule change that would make A TRILLION OF your taxpayer dollars subject to approval by a political appointee instead of scientists who understand the research. This rule will permanently damage US #Science. #unitedstates #stemeducation #mayday
My husband is a librarian at the University of California who specializes in open access. One of the proposed rules is that you can’t use grant money for publishing fees, which is the model that enables open access publishing. 😭
2026-07-12 22:41:44
1081
Erika Prints :
I work in cancer research and we are afraid
2026-07-12 18:14:26
885
Annie :
This proposal (FR doc. 2026‑10817) is not a neutral administrative update; it is a politicization of the federal research and public health grant system. Despite being framed as improving “transparency, accountability, and oversight,” the rule would:
Allow agencies to terminate grants “at any time without cause,”
Shift final grant decisions from peer review to political appointees, and
Restrict international collaboration.
It replaces a merit-driven, evidence-based grant system with a politically controlled, compliance-heavy apparatus. It sacrifices scientific rigor for ideological control under the thin guise of “better oversight.”
OMB should not adopt this rule in its current form.
2026-07-12 20:45:05
265
Lauren P :
There were over 50k public comments when I sent mine. Let’s double that number! We’re also asking them to extend the time for public comments to 90 days so include that in your comment if you can.
2026-07-12 18:50:44
721
thatgirlwithadog🇵🇸 :
I just left one of 228k comments
2026-07-12 19:13:16
185
Dr. Rubin, MD :
So important!
2026-07-12 17:31:20
266
Smurfette078🇨🇦 :
I stand with you. Your date in the captions say June 12th.
2026-07-12 17:40:28
61
HiJinx222 :
Not a scientist, but I believe in science and the scientific process. I submitted my public comment yesterday. I hope we can win this fight.
2026-07-12 19:37:47
59
Mary M :
Comment submitted and reposted this video. Only took 2 minutes. C'mon guys, lets do this!
2026-07-12 20:25:40
6
Melissa :
As of 8:08 PM central it still says there are 278,884 comments
2026-07-13 01:09:24
38
Reginald Phalange :
Submitted comment, reshared, liked, and commenting for the algorithm.
2026-07-12 18:24:22
52
Russellalabama :
I was comment 278884. Keep it going.
2026-07-12 23:20:57
20
David S :
will do, but check your date it says 6/12/26
2026-07-12 17:42:07
22
Chris :
I'm going into my final year of undergrad biology/psychology and am considering going for my PhD focusing on epigenetic transgenerational effects of dioxin exposure and possible treatments. It's a passion project of mine but I'm also worried about the state of education and research in the US. I'm not even sure I should be finishing my degree here. 😩
2026-07-13 09:55:52
10
lakotaWiyanGrace :
commented!! i want science grants to remain peer reviewed
2026-07-12 23:00:10
13
Kendra & Suki Gluten Free :
Done and reshared. Thank you for all your work and the time you take to educate us
2026-07-12 17:43:22
18
EcoDad27 :
This post arriving on Tuesday morning 😳
2026-07-14 10:06:55
5
DesertStargazer13 :
There are less than 300,000 comments as of this time. We need to get those comments in now!
2026-07-12 19:23:35
23
Kerry with a K :
Submitted my comment, took about three minutes. Please do it if you haven’t yet! The link was very easy to use!
2026-07-12 18:13:59
20
Beck :
I did it and hope it helps!
2026-07-12 18:25:02
15
austin_erika :
Here is some sample text you can use: Every one of us has either needed medical care ourselves or has someone we love who has. Many of the treatments we rely on today exist because of decades of scientific research supported by federally funded grants. Those grants have historically been evaluated through rigorous peer review by experts with the scientific knowledge to assess their merit, and that process has been fundamental to medical progress.
If the changes outlined in § 200.205 move decision making away from expert scientific review and toward political appointees without relevant subject matter expertise, the pace and quality of scientific research will suffer. Ultimately, it is the American public that will bear the cost through fewer medical advances and delayed improvements in patient care.
2026-07-14 00:41:54
9
Jessica P :
as a scientist in an academic lab, its scary
2026-07-12 21:29:48
9
Kay :
I just left one of 278k comments. C’mon, y’all! Please leave a comment!
2026-07-12 20:50:04
6
Alizah3 :
Thank you for sharing this information clearly. It’s so important
2026-07-12 17:43:17
12
westcoastlynn :
Just submitted a comment. 278,884 comments currently. 🙌🏻
2026-07-12 22:20:45
6
To see more videos from user @laughterinlight, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.