@laughterinlight: LAST DAY TODAY 7/13/2026. Please go to the link 🔗 at the top of my Linktree to leave a public comment for the OMB to help stop their proposed rule change that would make A TRILLION OF your taxpayer dollars subject to approval by a political appointee instead of scientists who understand the research. This rule will permanently damage US #Science. #unitedstates #stemeducation #mayday

LaughterinLight PhD
LaughterinLight PhD
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Sunday 12 July 2026 17:23:04 GMT
71993
16088
571
1016

Music

Download

Comments

thecoopscoop411
J & fam :
My husband is a librarian at the University of California who specializes in open access. One of the proposed rules is that you can’t use grant money for publishing fees, which is the model that enables open access publishing. 😭
2026-07-12 22:41:44
1081
erikaprints
Erika Prints :
I work in cancer research and we are afraid
2026-07-12 18:14:26
885
annhedonia52
Annie :
This proposal (FR doc. 2026‑10817) is not a neutral administrative update; it is a politicization of the federal research and public health grant system. Despite being framed as improving “transparency, accountability, and oversight,” the rule would: Allow agencies to terminate grants “at any time without cause,” Shift final grant decisions from peer review to political appointees, and Restrict international collaboration. It replaces a merit-driven, evidence-based grant system with a politically controlled, compliance-heavy apparatus. It sacrifices scientific rigor for ideological control under the thin guise of “better oversight.” OMB should not adopt this rule in its current form.
2026-07-12 20:45:05
265
laurenpcrna
Lauren P :
There were over 50k public comments when I sent mine. Let’s double that number! We’re also asking them to extend the time for public comments to 90 days so include that in your comment if you can.
2026-07-12 18:50:44
721
aphae_jade
thatgirlwithadog🇵🇸 :
I just left one of 228k comments
2026-07-12 19:13:16
185
rubin_allergy
Dr. Rubin, MD :
So important!
2026-07-12 17:31:20
266
smurfette078
Smurfette078🇨🇦 :
I stand with you. Your date in the captions say June 12th.
2026-07-12 17:40:28
61
aiyahhowcome
HiJinx222 :
Not a scientist, but I believe in science and the scientific process. I submitted my public comment yesterday. I hope we can win this fight.
2026-07-12 19:37:47
59
lalalaicanthearyou
Mary M :
Comment submitted and reposted this video. Only took 2 minutes. C'mon guys, lets do this!
2026-07-12 20:25:40
6
hollygonotsolight
Melissa :
As of 8:08 PM central it still says there are 278,884 comments
2026-07-13 01:09:24
38
shamelessoo
Reginald Phalange :
Submitted comment, reshared, liked, and commenting for the algorithm.
2026-07-12 18:24:22
52
russellalabama
Russellalabama :
I was comment 278884. Keep it going.
2026-07-12 23:20:57
20
xcorsair608
David S :
will do, but check your date it says 6/12/26
2026-07-12 17:42:07
22
tennoki
Chris :
I'm going into my final year of undergrad biology/psychology and am considering going for my PhD focusing on epigenetic transgenerational effects of dioxin exposure and possible treatments. It's a passion project of mine but I'm also worried about the state of education and research in the US. I'm not even sure I should be finishing my degree here. 😩
2026-07-13 09:55:52
10
teachingaltar1
lakotaWiyanGrace :
commented!! i want science grants to remain peer reviewed
2026-07-12 23:00:10
13
sukipwd
Kendra & Suki Gluten Free :
Done and reshared. Thank you for all your work and the time you take to educate us
2026-07-12 17:43:22
18
ecodad27
EcoDad27 :
This post arriving on Tuesday morning 😳
2026-07-14 10:06:55
5
desertstargazer13
DesertStargazer13 :
There are less than 300,000 comments as of this time. We need to get those comments in now!
2026-07-12 19:23:35
23
letameshindig
Kerry with a K :
Submitted my comment, took about three minutes. Please do it if you haven’t yet! The link was very easy to use!
2026-07-12 18:13:59
20
beck64574
Beck :
I did it and hope it helps!
2026-07-12 18:25:02
15
austin_erika
austin_erika :
Here is some sample text you can use: Every one of us has either needed medical care ourselves or has someone we love who has. Many of the treatments we rely on today exist because of decades of scientific research supported by federally funded grants. Those grants have historically been evaluated through rigorous peer review by experts with the scientific knowledge to assess their merit, and that process has been fundamental to medical progress. If the changes outlined in § 200.205 move decision making away from expert scientific review and toward political appointees without relevant subject matter expertise, the pace and quality of scientific research will suffer. Ultimately, it is the American public that will bear the cost through fewer medical advances and delayed improvements in patient care.
2026-07-14 00:41:54
9
jp_2133
Jessica P :
as a scientist in an academic lab, its scary
2026-07-12 21:29:48
9
duraniekay
Kay :
I just left one of 278k comments. C’mon, y’all! Please leave a comment!
2026-07-12 20:50:04
6
alizah720
Alizah3 :
Thank you for sharing this information clearly. It’s so important
2026-07-12 17:43:17
12
westcoastlynn
westcoastlynn :
Just submitted a comment. 278,884 comments currently. 🙌🏻
2026-07-12 22:20:45
6
To see more videos from user @laughterinlight, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos


About