@samaelisresting: Under rules like Section 36 of Rule 130 of the Rules of Court, a witness must have direct personal knowledge derived from their own perception to be deemed competent.

McDor :

investigators more often if not always do not have personal knowledge of a crime kaya nga nag iimbistiga.

keniiDick :

savage !

Daddy.EO :

Totoo naman, nagbase lang sila sa recorded video.

kym :

boom panes

Mr. Rey :

witness without personal knowledge, investigators na di naman nag imbestiga, tampered documents, daming typo, taz sa presscon 10/10 daw score nila😂 harap harapan nlang na lokohan nangyayare😂

Miss Gloucester :

Ang gwapo ni Atty. Vinluan!

🇵🇭A-Lin @🇹🇼 :

Agreed 👍

gel :

Absolute statements by the defense against prosecutions. Every details explained well, factual and truth. Confident to fight ang defense team dahil ang kanilang ipinaglalaban ay na-aayon sa Saligang Batas. The prosecutions committed illegal actions and bending the law. The defense counsel follow the rules, presents factual information to counterpart the accusations because it is demand to our constitution to respect the law.

🥰mari❤️ babar🥰 :

atty mark vinluan

Reiner Buschman :

Ano naman kung conclusion yun e conclusion naman talaga yun kasi nabuking after ng cross examination ng defense lawyer di tulad ng Prosecution na nagconclude agad kahit di pa nagsisimula yung trial 🙄

Jekjek Mamamo :

pwedi na pla maging witness yong Wala sa pinangyarihan or walang personal knowledge sa inakusa ano Yan chismis lang 😂

Tats_Lucifero :

Tama nga naman hahaha. para matapos na Ang "no personal knowledge"

laup :

ginagawang tama Ang mali😂😂😂😂

@Aisha306@ :

💚💚

Monixxx 🐝 :

Ang gwapo mo atty 😍

lungskie :

💚💚💚💚💚

Jent Das :

Galing ng defense ni Vp

Popol Gods ng Pinas 🤬 :

yun

𒆜🆂🦋🅶🅸✝️🆃🦋 🆁🅸🦋🅽𒆜 :

Crush ko na to., 🥰

Julz_Lodicake💦 :

ang gwapo talaga ni Atty Vinluan 😍😍😍😍

andalizajhelo :

he's cute 😊

BMW :

chris :