@kyejofaridah: Pupils of Kings David Junior school Ndejje have gotten an accident on their way back from Sipi falls' trip. #nextgeneralhardware #kyejodelivaries #onemilionviews #omuzimbianyirira #goviral

Kyejo Media
Kyejo Media
Open In TikTok:
Region: UG
Thursday 16 July 2026 21:43:36 GMT
119899
3696
85
276

Music

Download

Comments

e.dith_12
edith :
l know this school 😭😭 banange
2026-07-17 05:53:18
0
nabayazasylvia
sylvie sonia :
naye ngemulemerera biki. bannange tetugaanye accident zibaawo naye emotoka evuga abaana lwaki baba bagivuga speed okutuuka okulemerera driver Simething isnt right at all.
2026-07-17 03:15:47
0
daddyshan0
Baker Nsereko :
may GOD comfort the heartbroken
2026-07-17 10:58:07
1
desirerosee00
Rosette Desire" :
May God continue to strengthen our parents 🙏
2026-07-17 09:32:01
1
namayanjaedith736
jes jes :
Naye abaana lwaki babazunza ewaala in primary
2026-07-17 07:56:37
2
2222kwagala
TRUST GOD in all seasons :
naye kapchorwa for primary banange tusigaze zoo and other places
2026-07-17 04:40:20
15
timoofficial77
《《《 F.T.M》》》 :
May their should rest in peace
2026-07-17 04:35:12
4
henrietta_eo
Henrietta _ Okw :
I never allowed my kids to those trips I don’t like them
2026-07-16 22:25:22
3
rizyrex256
foreigner :
banange nga death has been trying us in uganda finally it has got wat it wanted . May there souls Rest in peace Lord have mercy on uganda
2026-07-16 22:29:32
2
bettinahbanke
✶B̷e̷t̷t̷i̷n̷a̷h̷❀B̷a̷n̷k̷x̷❦༻ :
nze otulo tumbuze 😭
2026-07-17 05:29:17
3
shifahxcavia256
XCAVy Shifah256 :
is also driver dead????
2026-07-17 05:36:28
2
user4034516333782
akankundaprossy :
mukama Kuma abaana bange🙏🙏🙏🙏
2026-07-17 11:48:49
1
user92125371831998
sheilah mulungi :
mbu ndejje has gotten an accident,wabula mutulekemu banange
2026-07-17 07:27:02
1
maricruiz97
Maricruiz :
mukama tuwonga abaana baffe mikono gyo
2026-07-17 06:32:25
1
najibu466
najibu :
kitalo
2026-07-17 04:51:11
1
nabagala.hanifah
Hanifah wa Big Gabriel :
Naye Sawa biri ezekyiro lwaki babera bavuga ekiro
2026-07-17 03:39:30
2
vicentbya
Taata Veran :
rip bambi
2026-07-17 09:14:20
0
thefavoursrukungiri
GOD'S MERCY :
kiiki kino maziima abaana babendi😭😭😭
2026-07-17 00:13:17
1
marysgkdjs
mary :
Bambii
2026-07-17 10:01:21
0
rachoray
saida :
inna wa inalilahi raajiun 😭😭
2026-07-17 13:38:14
0
ainembabazi.rinna1
ONE HEART :
😭😭😭😭😭😭😭rip little angles
2026-07-17 21:45:45
0
u.s.a.navy5
u.s.a navy :
sorry
2026-07-17 10:58:54
0
user4589096615625
nakirijja Maria :
Rest in peace 😭😭😭😭
2026-07-17 10:54:52
0
iryn790
Nankya Annet :
kitalo nyo mikwano kiruma
2026-07-17 09:44:01
0
To see more videos from user @kyejofaridah, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

පිරිමි තරහා ගියාම හෝ ප්‍රශ්නයක් ආවම නිහඬ වන්නේ ඇයි? 🤫 'ගුහාවේ රහස' ⛰️ ​ ​සම්බන්ධතාවයකදී පිරිමියෙක් එකපාරටම නිහඬ වුණාම හෝ ඈත් වුණාම, බොහෝවිට ඌ කරන්නේ
පිරිමි තරහා ගියාම හෝ ප්‍රශ්නයක් ආවම නිහඬ වන්නේ ඇයි? 🤫 'ගුහාවේ රහස' ⛰️ ​ ​සම්බන්ධතාවයකදී පිරිමියෙක් එකපාරටම නිහඬ වුණාම හෝ ඈත් වුණාම, බොහෝවිට ඌ කරන්නේ "ගුහාවට යෑම" කියන දේ.🚶‍♂️ මේක උගේ ස්වාභාවික ක්‍රමයක්. ප්‍රශ්නයක් ආවම ඌට ඕනේ තනියම ඉඳලා, හිතලා, විසඳුමක් හොයන්නයි. ඌ නිහඬ වෙන්නේ ඔයාව එපා වෙලා නිසා නෙවෙයි, ප්‍රශ්නය ගැන උගේ මොළය වැඩ කරන නිසා. 🧠 ​මේ වෙලාවට, ඔයා ඌට උපදෙස් දෙන්න හෝ බලෙන් කතා කරන්න හැදුවොත්, ඌ තවත් ගුහාව ඇතුළට යනවා. මොකද පිරිමියෙක් කැමති තමන්ගේ වැඩ තනියම කරගන්න හැකියාව තියෙන කෙනෙක් වගේ අනෙකාට දැනෙන්න හරින්නයි. 💪 ​ඔහුට අවශ්‍ය වෙන්නේ ටික වෙලාවකට නිදහස විතරයි. 🧘‍♂️ ඔබ ඉවසිලිවන්තව හිටියොත් සහ විශ්වාසය තැබුවොත්, ඌ අනිවාර්යයෙන්ම විසඳුම අරගෙන ආපහු එනවා. මේ වෙනස තේරුම් අරගෙන නිදහස දෙන්න. 😌 #counseling #happiness #LifeAdvice #motivation #srilankan_tik_tok🇱🇰
Dance party #iqmaxx  (IShowSpeed, KreekCraft, TungTungTungSahur, Gigachad, DrillSgtGrey, Yui Hirasawa, Pepe, Ayumu Kasuga, Xi Jinping, Buddha and Accelerationism) Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form  a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387.[1] Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is  g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[2] where g n = { 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 , if  n = 1  and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3 , if  n ≥ 2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid. #sinister #larp #333 #dwbi
Dance party #iqmaxx (IShowSpeed, KreekCraft, TungTungTungSahur, Gigachad, DrillSgtGrey, Yui Hirasawa, Pepe, Ayumu Kasuga, Xi Jinping, Buddha and Accelerationism) Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387.[1] Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[2] where g n = { 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 , if n = 1 and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3 , if n ≥ 2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid. #sinister #larp #333 #dwbi

About