@dont.touch.myego: ప్లీజ్ ప్రతి ఒకరు చుడండి సూపర్ మెసెజ్. మీ పిల్లలు కోసం #👍 #

జీవితం ఒక నాటకం
జీవితం ఒక నాటకం
Open In TikTok:
Region: QA
Thursday 16 July 2026 22:03:42 GMT
30495
1367
23
353

Music

Download

Comments

guttula.srinivas
Guttula Srinivas :
1000000% curect
2026-08-17 12:20:33
2
chinnunani143
ChInnUNaNi :
his right
2026-09-02 13:48:08
0
petchetti.trimurt
Petchetti Trimurthulu :
super 👍👍👍
2026-08-26 05:46:13
0
mn.raju7
Mn Raju :
correct ga chepparu sir
2026-08-24 15:49:22
2
gadidalaraju.raju
madii :
👍
2026-08-03 22:42:29
2
user1443246925826
user1443246925826 :
సూపర్
2026-08-18 12:16:49
0
sai32348
🌿🌿🌿🌹🌹🌹SAI 🌹🌹🌹🌿🌿🌿 :
super
2026-08-17 17:21:00
0
lakshmi12302
lakshmi12302 :
super 👌
2026-08-20 10:39:28
0
anu.anu7746
Anu Anu :
🙏🙏🙏
2026-07-27 10:17:59
2
kumar42167
💐💐💐 :
👌👌👌👌
2026-08-05 04:52:10
1
thotakurasanthosh
thotakurasanthosh :
🙏🙏🙏
2026-07-17 10:51:35
1
user439978606
user439978606 :
🙏🙏🙏
2026-07-17 14:46:14
1
prasadpr046
☆❣️ᴘʀᴀsᴀᴅ❣️☆ :
💯💯
2026-07-29 15:43:54
1
userh49y59js5e
ఏసు జనసేన రావులపాలెం :
👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌
2026-08-18 14:05:27
0
moth793india3
💞నేను నా జీవితం 💞 :
💯💯💯
2026-07-18 04:20:08
0
user6245906944975
k. sheshikumar :
🙏🙏🙏
2026-08-31 01:18:15
0
teja4397
teja❤️ :
🙏🙏
2026-08-12 11:48:24
0
ram171715
Ram :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-08-13 12:32:45
0
reyazsyed1977
syed.reyaz :
👍👍👍
2026-08-17 05:53:57
0
krishna.badige
Krishna Badige :
👍👍👍
2026-07-17 18:28:54
0
sameer.rider.2428
𝕊𝔸𝕄𝔼𝔼ℝ ℝ𝕀𝔻𝔼ℝ :
👍👍💯💯
2026-07-17 15:49:54
0
chandu.marella3
Chandu Marella :
👌
2026-09-01 11:56:59
0
To see more videos from user @dont.touch.myego, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Sometimes the smartest RRSP move is to leave it  The meltdown is a bet on your future effective rate, not your future bracket. The technical correction first, because it's load-bearing and almost every article gets it wrong. Regulation 7308(4) sets your RRIF factor by your age at the beginning of the year. So in the calendar year you turn 72 you were 71 on January 1, and the factor is 5.28 percent, not 5.40. On $200,000 that's $10,560. The 5.40 factor belongs to the year you turn 73. And one more guard rail: the first minimum applies the year after the RRIF is established, not at 72. Convert at 65 and your first minimum is at 66. The second correction is conceptual. Deferral by itself is worth nothing. If your marginal rate is identical in both years, an RRSP and a TFSA hand you exactly the same after-tax dollar, because the order you multiply in doesn't matter. The RRSP's whole advantage is the rate spread. Which means the test is your marginal effective rate, not your bracket, and the effective rate includes the 15 percent OAS recovery tax above $95,323, GIS at 50 to 75 cents on the dollar, and the fact that a survivor reports the same household income at single rates with one OAS instead of two. On Rational Reminder 367, from July 2025, Ben Felix and Cameron Passmore worked a real meltdown case with PWL's Louai Bibi. The client had been convinced by YouTube. Their finding: in present value terms the difference between strategies was negligible. Not zero, and worth quoting fully, because their modelling did show a small gain in after-tax estate value from modest withdrawals each year up to 70, driven by unused TFSA room and the clawback. That is a very different sentence from
Sometimes the smartest RRSP move is to leave it The meltdown is a bet on your future effective rate, not your future bracket. The technical correction first, because it's load-bearing and almost every article gets it wrong. Regulation 7308(4) sets your RRIF factor by your age at the beginning of the year. So in the calendar year you turn 72 you were 71 on January 1, and the factor is 5.28 percent, not 5.40. On $200,000 that's $10,560. The 5.40 factor belongs to the year you turn 73. And one more guard rail: the first minimum applies the year after the RRIF is established, not at 72. Convert at 65 and your first minimum is at 66. The second correction is conceptual. Deferral by itself is worth nothing. If your marginal rate is identical in both years, an RRSP and a TFSA hand you exactly the same after-tax dollar, because the order you multiply in doesn't matter. The RRSP's whole advantage is the rate spread. Which means the test is your marginal effective rate, not your bracket, and the effective rate includes the 15 percent OAS recovery tax above $95,323, GIS at 50 to 75 cents on the dollar, and the fact that a survivor reports the same household income at single rates with one OAS instead of two. On Rational Reminder 367, from July 2025, Ben Felix and Cameron Passmore worked a real meltdown case with PWL's Louai Bibi. The client had been convinced by YouTube. Their finding: in present value terms the difference between strategies was negligible. Not zero, and worth quoting fully, because their modelling did show a small gain in after-tax estate value from modest withdrawals each year up to 70, driven by unused TFSA room and the clawback. That is a very different sentence from "drain it before 71." Doug Chandler's FP Canada work names the mechanism plainly: the advantage is easiest to demonstrate when the excess withdrawal funds a TFSA contribution, and tax on non-registered investment income drags down whatever you gained on brackets. So the destination matters more than the drain. Where the meltdown genuinely earns its reputation: large balances where the forced minimum will cross the clawback line, singles with nobody to roll to, couples planning for the second death, and anyone with empty TFSA room. Chandler's own warning, which applies to every meltdown projection including mine: simple, single-scenario projections of the value of a drawdown strategy are unreliable and misleading. The meltdown is a tool, not a rule. Educational only, not advice. Your province, your income, your accounts.

About