@..pensive: @nomorespin a response, this is a very bare bones response, don’t expect too much.

Mob.sok :

Anarxism? Did you mean axiarchism?

pensive :

some clarity (i) I know in the video you clarified the modality to metaphysical, but still very important that we recognize the correct modality is epistemic (ii) the original comment that wasn’t my point about a frequentist view being assumed. My objection is similar objections raised against “this universe” responses (iii) The range stuff, well that’s not actually the point. Remember all FTA has to establish in this case is that the range physics gives us is reasonable. Most people in literature reject most of the assumptions in the original objection. Also for a range of what physics gives us i’ll point you to barnes (2019)

✝️Jery✝️ :

Peak!

¬ 𝙇𝙞𝙩 ‧₊˚ ☁︎ :

Why this video 😭😭

kiwi :

monkeyboy_logic :

Who tf u think can sit through this with this fuckin gif