@dicunghahanha: Là phép màu, không phải lời tạm biệt #memory #mientay #haugiang95 @phuong thao🥀 @cuKhang. @Seaiuemmmm @Bảo Phúc😘 @Kiều Trâm @Minh hào @Thầy Ben @Bao Long @H.Phonk @️ @ánh xuân @Gia Anh @Lạclacjneg🥀 @chiquang. @TấN TàI☔💛 @Lâm•Wizard @nghi sà lan @thúy vân @

dicunghahanha
dicunghahanha
Open In TikTok:
Region: VN
Sunday 19 July 2026 02:32:45 GMT
9885
292
62
58

Music

Download

Comments

minhkhangv777
cuKhang. :
2026-07-19 04:14:17
2
windphonklmeolanixius
Wind🌪 :
mới đó mà đã hết 3 tuần 🤧
2026-07-19 02:43:23
2
lamlauriel19
Lâm•Wizard :
bùn quá khóc k nổi 😢
2026-07-19 03:35:39
1
nguyn.thng6100
Seaiuemmmm :
sống cho tương lại đừng sống cho quá khứ nhaaa chị haha, hẹn gặp lại🥺
2026-07-19 02:57:13
3
nguyenhuynh7850
ở nhà 1 mình :
coi mà khóc theo 😭😭😭
2026-07-19 03:10:13
2
huyz113
CFC CHÂU HOÀNG HUY :
đừng quên tụi em nha chị 😭🥹
2026-07-19 05:50:15
2
khoichinguyen2k12
khoi :
khóc
2026-07-19 03:34:26
2
ph_h07
Nᵍᵘ̛ᵒ̛̀ⁱ Lⁱ̀ Hᵒ̛̣ᵖ Tⁱ́ⁿʰ :
cx khóc như này nhưng mà là năm trc
2026-07-19 10:11:42
1
nghetkephanboi.2
TấN TàI☔💛 :
khởi đầu and kết thúc🥺
2026-07-19 03:19:43
2
chu.belacloii
Lạclacjneg🥀 :
2026-07-19 02:59:30
2
trn.quc.thanh36
chàng béo thích đánh cầu :
kì nghỉ hè đáng nhớ
2026-07-19 14:16:33
1
vytran8374
Vy Trần :
Nhớ mấy anh chị lắm
2026-07-19 04:23:37
1
phng.uyn.trn56
cô tiên nữ trần giang🐍🐍🐍 :
coi mà khóc
2026-07-19 02:47:21
1
q_t.100.wwe
тʀườɴԍoт⁀ᶦᵈᵒᶫ :
2026-07-19 03:18:55
1
t.quyn012
tú quyên :
là sao vậy ạ
2026-07-19 10:40:44
0
popipo.110
chung thuỷ nhất vn :
thì raa chị đã gọi tên mình trong xe 😭😭😭😭
2026-07-19 02:53:39
1
vojeutenkim
2 giờ sáng. :
là sao v ạ
2026-07-19 09:23:32
1
jung_78956
ʇɥɐuɥ #★ :
2026-07-19 06:02:11
1
anh.hoang7264
xuân xuân là mặt trời nhỏ :
coi xong khóc nữa
2026-07-19 05:24:01
1
nht.huy9280
Huy Heovl :
@Hoangan🍁 🗿
2026-07-19 09:00:36
1
To see more videos from user @dicunghahanha, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Pseudo-profound BS is when somebody strings together a series of deep-sounding words, and listeners interpret it as being deep. For example, somebody says that ‘the force of now will make you whole,’ and everybody nods along. That is brilliant. Put it on a poster, double tap to like, and reshare.  But in 2015, the researcher Gordon Pennycook won an Ig Nobel Prize for showing that a lot of people can't tell the difference between genuine philosophy and pseudo-profound BS. And of course, as somebody like me, that is a bit of a worry.  Pennycook argued that there are two reasons for this. The first is structural. If you read a well-formed or even beautiful sentence, you want to assume that the author has given as much thought to the meaning as to the poetry, and the second is to do with the words themselves. If you come across deep and philosophical words, you want the sentence to work. And if you can't at first understand it, you blame yourself rather than the incomprehensible word salad in front of you. The confusion gets relabelled as depth, and the author gets rebranded as some misunderstood sage.  But as Nietzsche once put it, we should beware those who muddy the water to make it appear deep. There is an entire class of people in marketing, management, politics, the wellness industry, and in philosophy, who think that stringing together a series of profound words makes them a genius. But words are only as deep as they can be understood. And if somebody hides their ideas behind long, pretentious, purple prose, then perhaps their ideas weren't as clear as they thought at the start.
Pseudo-profound BS is when somebody strings together a series of deep-sounding words, and listeners interpret it as being deep. For example, somebody says that ‘the force of now will make you whole,’ and everybody nods along. That is brilliant. Put it on a poster, double tap to like, and reshare. But in 2015, the researcher Gordon Pennycook won an Ig Nobel Prize for showing that a lot of people can't tell the difference between genuine philosophy and pseudo-profound BS. And of course, as somebody like me, that is a bit of a worry. Pennycook argued that there are two reasons for this. The first is structural. If you read a well-formed or even beautiful sentence, you want to assume that the author has given as much thought to the meaning as to the poetry, and the second is to do with the words themselves. If you come across deep and philosophical words, you want the sentence to work. And if you can't at first understand it, you blame yourself rather than the incomprehensible word salad in front of you. The confusion gets relabelled as depth, and the author gets rebranded as some misunderstood sage. But as Nietzsche once put it, we should beware those who muddy the water to make it appear deep. There is an entire class of people in marketing, management, politics, the wellness industry, and in philosophy, who think that stringing together a series of profound words makes them a genius. But words are only as deep as they can be understood. And if somebody hides their ideas behind long, pretentious, purple prose, then perhaps their ideas weren't as clear as they thought at the start.

About