@wealthonmars:

WOM
WOM
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Monday 20 July 2026 17:09:49 GMT
8714
141
17
11

Music

Download

Comments

fosle2
Ausländer :
no problem, I bought it (rocket lab) to keep for 8-10 years
2026-07-27 16:04:12
0
viiviis06
viiviis06 :
I need to sell rklb 😭😭😭 before I lose more
2026-07-20 17:39:14
6
martin_fouad
Martin_f :
Sofi?
2026-07-20 23:54:51
1
colby5179
Colby :
Not going below $20 bruh 😂 already skyrocketing again
2026-07-22 01:15:34
1
kiranjaavl
kiranja :
I thought about Roblox on tha huge dip but passed
2026-07-21 20:52:41
2
mevalevergaguey1
American_Psycho 😈 :
Those are pump and dump stocks IYKYK
2026-07-25 16:38:17
0
natalie187722
Natalie :
Crazy to think rocket lab will go to 20. I think you’re looking at 200 next year
2026-07-26 12:15:11
0
pokesniper7
Lunapuma28 :
how about SPCX?
2026-07-21 05:09:23
1
rambowealth
RamboWealth :
I got whipped out
2026-07-21 02:42:27
1
user648019464
Anthony :
@
2026-07-21 23:04:02
1
To see more videos from user @wealthonmars, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

We spend years telling women to care less about the state of their house. And then research proves we judge them when they do. She is criticised for caring too much and criticised for not caring enough. There is no version of this where she gets it right. Because the standard was never meant to be met. It was meant to keep her trying. Professor Leah Ruppanner, sociologist and author of Drained, conducted a study with colleagues at NYU and UC Santa Barbara that should have ended this conversation permanently. They showed participants a photo of a room, either clean or messy, and told half of them it belonged to John and half that it belonged to Jennifer. Same room. Same mess. Different name. Men and women both rated the messy room equally messy. Which immediately demolished the “men just can’t see it” myth. They can see it. They simply face no consequences for leaving it. But here is where it gets important. When participants believed the room belonged to Jennifer, they rated it as needing more urgent cleaning — even when it was objectively clean. They judged Jennifer as less moral, less responsible, less competent. They believed she would face more social consequences if someone dropped in unexpectedly. Even in a clean room. Even when the room was identical to John’s. As Ruppanner writes: “When women talk about the sky-high standards of having homes that are always in an Instagrammable state, these standards are not in their heads. These pressures are real, the consequences for women are significant, and we have the data to back it up.” This is why she cannot relax in a messy house. Not because she is a neat freak or a control freak or has impossibly high standards. Because she is correct that she will be judged for it in ways he simply will not be. The solution is not for her to care less. The solution is for the standard to be applied equally. Or better yet, for someone else in the house to care too.
We spend years telling women to care less about the state of their house. And then research proves we judge them when they do. She is criticised for caring too much and criticised for not caring enough. There is no version of this where she gets it right. Because the standard was never meant to be met. It was meant to keep her trying. Professor Leah Ruppanner, sociologist and author of Drained, conducted a study with colleagues at NYU and UC Santa Barbara that should have ended this conversation permanently. They showed participants a photo of a room, either clean or messy, and told half of them it belonged to John and half that it belonged to Jennifer. Same room. Same mess. Different name. Men and women both rated the messy room equally messy. Which immediately demolished the “men just can’t see it” myth. They can see it. They simply face no consequences for leaving it. But here is where it gets important. When participants believed the room belonged to Jennifer, they rated it as needing more urgent cleaning — even when it was objectively clean. They judged Jennifer as less moral, less responsible, less competent. They believed she would face more social consequences if someone dropped in unexpectedly. Even in a clean room. Even when the room was identical to John’s. As Ruppanner writes: “When women talk about the sky-high standards of having homes that are always in an Instagrammable state, these standards are not in their heads. These pressures are real, the consequences for women are significant, and we have the data to back it up.” This is why she cannot relax in a messy house. Not because she is a neat freak or a control freak or has impossibly high standards. Because she is correct that she will be judged for it in ways he simply will not be. The solution is not for her to care less. The solution is for the standard to be applied equally. Or better yet, for someone else in the house to care too.

About