@axingmy5: #cops#fyp#Love#audit#1st

TompkinsTone :

Speaking of Chiefs ..😅😅😅

Kim Wingo :

He’s always wasting everyone’s time

Terry 50 :

Great Job officer's

dannywright574 :

Exactly right, wasting everybody's time.

Lillian Brooks :

arrest him

☀️Mis Sunshine☀️ :

He talks way to much

Batista736 :

Has James never watched a vlog before? Most vloggers spend the majority of their videos focusing the camera on themselves, using it to document their own lives and experiences. Even when they do end up filming other people, many vloggers try to handle it respectfully. They’ll blur someone’s face, avoid recording people who clearly don’t want to be on camera, or remove footage if someone brings up a concern. That’s where the problem comes in with some First Amendment auditors. If someone clearly doesn’t want to be recorded, the respectful thing to do is acknowledge that and blur their face afterward. You can say you’re exercising your rights, but it’s also important to remember that other people have rights and personal boundaries too.

Que Woods :

James trying to use fear to intimidate the police.

Eric Terry :

call Chief Scott

jimrobertson485 :

arrest him, he is a felon

breacher :

He’s lying cause to this day the supreme court’s have never ruled on the is issue

Marvin Positively Law Junior :

that officer has a good point about documenting his day.

Portia (A Purposeful Life) :

Sad

Bud Lattimore :

When our public servants have turned against the citizens they serve. We are in bad trouble.

Munky :

Acura :

James says the same old stuff every time he posted up.

phillipsigmon :

Lock hm up please

Lmack :

Get him Mr. Officer 😏

RAKKASAN-SCOUT :

You’re not just walking in and speaking to the chief that’s not how that works. You don’t carry near that amount of weight you’re more of a deputy corporal kind of interaction.

Auditfrauditorsstopharassnent :

Case law is specific, not general! James doesn’t know the law! He is there to rage bait for monetization! Learn the 10th Amendment!

Munky :

LVraidersteam :

Do it

RamRodJones727 :

Apologize My Azz

Edjykins52 :

So sick of this lying POS with his misinformation. Government property is not treated equally under the First Amendment. The courts categorize public spaces into different "forums," which dictates how much the government can restrict activity:Traditional Public Forums: These are places like public parks, sidewalks, and streets. Several U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals have recognized a clear First Amendment right to record public officials and law enforcement officers working in these spaces.Limited or Nonpublic Forums: Most public buildings—such as town halls, police station lobbies, courthouses, schools, and post offices—fall into this category. The government is legally permitted to restrict filming in these areas as long as the restrictions are reasonable and viewpoint-neutral. the United States Supreme Court has not ruled that First Amendment auditors have an unlimited right to film in any public building. In fact, the Supreme Court has never ruled directly on a case specifically involving First Amendment auditors or a generalized constitutional right to video record inside government buildings.The legal boundaries for filming on public property are instead dictated by lower federal courts and established constitutional doctrines, which strictly dictate that the right to record is not absolute and is subject to major limitations. This useless POS thinks he can just run his mouth. He couldn’t teach Fido to fetch a ball.