Dr. Judy Melinek
Region: NZ
Friday 24 July 2026 21:17:54 GMT
17463
600
310
42
Music
Download
Comments
✝️| Ke Hobbies + Life :
The understanding of the second autopsy proves that we are indeed in a literacy crisis. He thoroughly wrote this report. I think the issue was Crump reading it.
2026-07-26 10:47:27
95
Minnie :
You are highly mistaken! Nolan’s corpse did not have the throat, the lungs or stomach. If they had the lungs they would still be able to run certain tests to determine if there was a possible drowning
2026-08-10 00:22:37
3
Jessica Pillas :
We don’t need an autopsy to determine they killer him. They incriminated themselves on the tow call. Yelling “Nolan wake up” “is he dead” and “check is chest”
2026-07-26 14:51:20
9
Footloose Will :
completely logical explanation. why do people still insist on blaming these boys? I don't get it
2026-07-26 19:32:25
20
marsh marsh :
So the second autopsy was basically useless. And the first examiner can just say anything and there is no way to prove if it’s true or not. An independent pathologist should have been present to view the first autopsy
2026-07-24 22:36:27
18
wrong again :
This is a moot point..The sheriff said it was a accidental drowning one hour after finding the body..They will make sure it sticks..
2026-07-25 22:40:28
1
DaveSlick :
what about the apparent trauma to the occipital area?
2026-07-25 01:30:22
0
Dallena Tatana :
did the first examiner sabotage the process by slicing?
2026-07-26 09:00:15
5
C'est la vie 🇨🇦🍁🇨🇦 :
When a young person dies under suspicious circumstances, a closed-door system that shuts out the family only breeds mistrust and fuels destructive rumors. Rather than forcing a grieving family to put a loved one’s body through a second invasive autopsy—which often leads to missing tissues, delayed answers, and claims of sabotage—there ought to be a standard protocol that allows a family’s chosen medical representative to witness the initial examination or access live video records. An open process built on immediate transparency respects the family, maintains the integrity of the evidence, and gives everyone a single, undisputed conclusion instead of an official monopoly on the truth that serves no one.
2026-07-27 18:09:02
3
TKD :
So basically the results of the second autopsy should not have been released until it was completed.
2026-07-26 15:31:14
8
wooshturner :
Basically, we will never know what happened smh
2026-07-26 16:06:52
0
Eddie&Danielle :
At this point the investigation doesn’t even matter, people have already drawn their own conclusions, when it’s ruled a drowning people aren’t gonna accept it
2026-07-26 07:10:01
12
esscare_ai :
Hopefully the autopsy was properly recorded for transparency
2026-07-24 23:49:20
12
Chris :
thank you for the information. unfortunately your explanation will fall on deaf ears. this will not fit other people's narrative. they don't want facts. they want to hear he was killed.
2026-07-26 03:27:44
8
Nanny Goose :
So it’s a cover up ?
2026-07-26 08:04:06
0
Paj🌸 :
There was a post some physic median or whatever you call them said that according to her readings there was something about the throat of that nature like something could’ve been in his throat
2026-07-26 01:45:10
0
_Crxssyy :
Can the first pathologist tamper with evidence from the autopsy they conducted and get away with it undetected? Or, would the 2nd pathologist be able to see if any tampering took place during the first autopsy whenever he gets to examine the neck block and brain?
2026-07-30 15:54:15
1
Jmk :
Its taking too long for the result of the first autopsy to be released. I sense foul play honestly
2026-07-26 17:09:24
3
unc_dawgs :
How do you know the sliced organs belong to the body
2026-08-04 22:16:23
0
Qskii🦈 :
but was there fluid why was it not stated & tested
2026-07-25 02:05:18
0
WillieMac :
You’re saying the fluid leaked out of the lungs, there are people claiming to be a pathologist and they are saying that the lungs don’t fill up with fluid, stated the lungs are like a sponge and they absorb the water. So which is it. I’m confused now.
2026-07-26 01:49:20
0
xyzabc :
poor young man,got killed,now this and tmz trying potray him as a heavy drinker.
2026-07-29 05:49:31
2
B.Carol :
Do you do autopsy with out the family present in America or any witness? In my country and autopsy is witnessed by atleast two family members.
2026-07-27 21:01:08
0
frankoneal8 :
Would the second autopsy been more effective for evidence gathering had the examiner traveled to the body vs. the body being transported to the second examination?
2026-07-26 17:03:28
1
Dr. Keisha Davis, MD :
EXACTLY!!
2026-07-29 14:56:51
1
To see more videos from user @drjudymelinek, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
