きい⌇生活感を整える収納アイデア
Region: JP
Saturday 25 July 2026 05:34:54 GMT
519541
20579
150
751
Music
Download
Comments
s.hay :
アイテムを 分かりやすく 記載して下さってるので セリアで探しやすいです🍀*゜ とても助かります✨ 参考にさせて頂きます🥰
2026-07-25 15:07:02
15
Mipo :
容器洗うの面倒いのよ
2026-07-25 11:46:25
43
minami :
ステンレス容器は、どこで買えますか？ まさか、セリアじゃないですよね？
2026-07-25 23:24:32
2
piyof5 :
わあ～❇ お片付けが大のニガテな私からみたらまるで魔法みたいです～(o^_^o)❇ 100均大好きで、ガーデニング用品や手芸用品、インテリア雑貨売り場にはよく行くんだけど、収納用品は商品を見てもこんなに素晴らしい使い方が私には浮かばない…(T_T)💧 凄いなあ～💕 ひたすら尊敬しちゃいます(^^)v❇
2026-08-02 00:43:00
1
みかんのしっぽ🍊 :
この収納いいなぁと思い買いに行くけど100均のお店に入った途端買うもの忘れるし、買えてもサイズが合わなかったり🤣
2026-08-04 09:46:44
5
salt :
ぱっと見きれいなんだけど ケースが多い分庫内が狭くなるのがなぁ…
2026-07-29 07:04:51
25
あちち🫠🖤 :
すごいです、羨ましいです🥺自分でこんなに綺麗にしても家族が適当に置くから結局ゴチャゴチャになっちゃう😭
2026-07-30 00:31:03
1
ともみ :
コンテナボックスとクリップのやつ、真似しよーっと😋
2026-07-31 06:21:15
1
∞りえこ🐾 :
すごぉ😳😳😳めっちゃ参考になります！！真似させてもらいまーす❣️
2026-07-25 09:09:03
8
くう🐶💉🧡 :
うち、おんなじ冷蔵庫使ってるのに こんなにキレーに収納出来るのか マネします🥺💕
2026-07-31 05:35:13
1
コブタ :
めちゃくちゃ綺麗な冷凍室ですね😳
2026-07-27 07:22:59
1
らいらい :
この容器とこの容器と‥ サイズ入るか？となるとめんどくさくなって帰ってくるのを何回繰り返したか‥
2026-07-27 02:37:35
5
こと :
天才だ、、
2026-07-29 04:56:25
2
ocona5 :
冷凍庫の中ぐちゃぐちゃなので、
2026-07-27 23:50:26
1
良子 :
一度同じように綺麗にしてみたけど、結局買い物直後に上にボンボン置いてって一瞬で元に戻っちゃった😂
2026-07-28 06:33:45
32
まりん :
んー。決まった物しか入らなくなるね。残り少なくなっても場所を取ってるからスペースがない。
2026-08-02 01:39:40
1
MR :
素晴らしい👍賢いね😊
2026-07-28 00:34:35
1
ゆぅ :
コンテナBOX今日買いに行こ〜
2026-07-26 21:06:58
1
ocona5 :
やってみようと思いました！😁
2026-07-27 23:50:53
1
ぼーるちゃん :
動画見て満足しちゃうwww
2026-07-30 04:01:05
1
ちぬえ :
美しい〜👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
2026-07-26 00:09:22
2
みーちこ :
早すぎて目が追いつかない😂
2026-07-26 07:21:32
2
kiki81543 :
素晴らしい😳冷蔵庫の中ぐちゃぐちゃで困ってた😆頑張って真似しよっ🥰
2026-07-26 10:30:18
2
みぃ :
ネッククーラーは中身が偏るので立てておかないほうがいいと聞きました
2026-07-28 15:36:33
1
vicky :
ご紹介通り購入すれば良いので、とても簡潔にまとめてくださり助かります！
2026-07-28 12:00:47
1
To see more videos from user @kii.no.kurashi, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
![Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387.[1] Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[2] where g n = { 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 , if n = 1 and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3 , if n ≥ 2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid.#tcc #tcd #kurdistan #fyp #iqmaxx](/video/cover/7666605296881618209.webp)
