Sleepless In Mind
Region: ID
Sunday 26 July 2026 05:40:23 GMT
63185
2091
40
326
Music
Download
Comments
MamaAbedTefo :
ya Tuhan...karena butuh,sy harus bertahan
2026-07-26 13:45:05
6
sri :
Karena butuh q bertahan,,, walaupun selalu difitnah, dijatuhkan
2026-07-30 08:17:56
5
yentinovitasari13 :
true
2026-07-26 14:34:26
1
ren3 :
Ya Allah...posisi bertahan atau menyerah 😭
2026-07-29 03:46:39
2
lulalie987 :
aq tim karyawan bos marah satu kli, aq lngsung ngengas,prinsipku,jujur tanggung jawab,disiplin,pekerja kras,klopun lapar klo kerjaan blum selesai,slalu ditunda smpek adzhar, tp jg prnh salahkan aq jka smw yg aq lakukan sllu slah,walaupun anda bos pasti aq lawan😭,mo cri dmn cobak dlm setahun aq liburnya cmn pas idul fitrih,sakitpun tetep krj, bhkn prnh pingsan dtmpt krj, tensi sdh 80,tp besoknya tetep msuk kepikiran sm boss
2026-08-03 13:37:32
1
irma megawati :
tpi tu kenyataan
2026-07-27 20:54:11
3
bernitz :
yeessss👍
2026-07-27 08:40:38
2
Yuliani :
Betull🥹
2026-08-03 16:46:44
1
Honey🍯Bee🐝 :
Aku skrg ttp bertahan demi kelangsungan hidup 😳
2026-08-03 05:04:17
2
Naning :
betul
2026-07-27 16:05:01
2
sopsopsop :
betul bgt apalagi yg berhubungan jasa atau service ketemu orang bnyk ,, mesti bnyk sabar dan istigfar
2026-07-30 02:18:18
2
AnneSeffiane :
pernah banget di posisi ini .. dan itu jadi bekal saya ketika ahirnya sy pindah kerja. bekal untuk kuat menghadapi tantangan berikutnya . bisa agak lebih prepare menghadapi situasi
2026-08-01 02:38:49
1
Deeedeee :
bertahan karena butuh kuat kan ya Alloh
2026-07-28 06:02:59
3
mocci :
bertahan karna bgtu bnyk niat"yng belum terwujud kan
2026-08-01 04:58:49
1
Wiwidyayeay12 :
masya allah
2026-07-27 05:27:57
2
BawengFb18 :
alhamdulillah dari 2018-2026 masih di tempat yang sama 💪
2026-07-30 00:37:57
1
cherrybloosom :
lagi ngalamin
2026-07-28 11:01:54
1
Silvia Silvia :
krna butuh pd hal umur sdh mo stngh abad bdn rasa y dah nano2, ttp semangat n sehat2 slalu utk ibu2 pejuang receh 🥰
2026-08-01 07:03:19
2
elis_elis :
ya allah berikanlah q kekuatan, kesabaran, keikhlasan dalam menjalaninya🤲😭😭😭😭😭Pengen risgn ya allah
2026-07-28 08:00:19
2
John Adam :
betull
2026-07-31 15:12:26
1
sitisuhaimi222 :
aku salah seorang kl d marahin bos bisa langsung marah balik hehe😂😂
2026-08-03 00:16:44
1
Elisthv :
ngga ada yang kebetulan kan?
2026-08-01 19:41:23
1
Tinny 864 :
ya Allah tiada kekuatan apapun selain Engkau ya Allah 😭😭😭
2026-08-01 08:57:26
1
Asa :
kadang bukan pekerjaan yg bikin lelah tp sikap manusia yg melelahkan.
2026-08-07 10:13:35
0
mama airaa_31 :
izin share ya kak 🙏
2026-08-07 00:19:46
1
To see more videos from user @sleeplessinmind.id, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
![Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387.[1] Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[2] where g n = { 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 , if n = 1 and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3 , if n ≥ 2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid. #deltarune #gaster #greengaster #дельтарун #гастер](/video/cover/7670993998336494869.webp)
