jimmy.inter.verbum :
Hey, music person here (I have a degree in classical music and have direct experience with early music institutions). The early music movement didn't fail, it was absorbed. My school (IU) has an entire institute for historical performance, and it's one of several (Juilliard, Yale, the Schola Cantorum in Basel). It has also influenced outside educational spheres. For example mainstream orchestras now play Bach and Handel with smaller groups, less vibrato, and lighter articulation. The movement's ideas became standard practice, which is usually what winning looks like. On instruments, I'd gently push on "worse." A fortepiano isn't a lower-quality piano it's a different instrument with a lighter action, and faster decay, and a clearer bass, so Mozart's textures sound balanced on it in a way they can on a Steinway only with effort. And the best players of any era were largely given the best instruments their patrons could afford. For example, adult Mozart's Walter fortepiano was a top-tier instrument, meticulously maintained. Some period limitations were real (natural horns cant play chromatic scales, so composers wrote around the gaps), but that's a constraint the music was designed for, not a defect in craftsmanship.
2026-09-16 20:55:35