@alfielucidontology: A portion of a dialectical inquiry into the sociology of families…. New essay incoming on this lol #postmodernism #lacan #freud #philosophy #psychoanalysis

NSABackdooredMyThinkpadⒶ⚧⛧🜠 :

ig subject can exist w/o symbolic field just in field of intensities😣

dissolve_unto_apotheosis :

Be so fr

Vibetracks Studio :

you need to read Difference and Repetition, that the Difference exist as the predecessor, before the form of structure and subject emerges, $Oa only explain about higher order of structure and identity to be a fixation explanatory, but unable to explain about the variations of structure, at this point, the problem isn't about the Ideological construct, but the Difference that exist beyond Master Signifier

luu.catarina :

but this isn’t freud’s theory… this is lacan is it not?

itsauquet :

the idea that the subject is empty of essence only contradicts the traditions of "some" schools of psychoanalytic practice but isn't incompatible with psychoanalytic theory - especially lacanian, but also and to some extent, Freudian. imo it's actually a much better fit, and opposing both is usually none but a sterile semantics debate. "la femme n'existe pas" is the most post structuralist shit you can say btw - the subject can call itself whatever, whether picking and choosing from the other's signifiers array, or with signifiers it will create during its life : it's all the same. you can never understand what the Other mean when presenting a signifier to you, whether the Other is "science", "biology", or your neighbour's grand-niece, because language is faulty. you can and will only ever be "you", or "your version of what is a woman/a mother/a wealthy individual/someone kind...". all of these are defined in an absurdly different way in the Others' heads than you define them in your own head. la femme n'existe pas, il n'y a pas de rapport sexuel, you're signifiers only ever sure of what a signifier mean to you : so it's all constructs indeed. psychoanalysis can either post structuralist or individual-essentialist to work - otherwise as an analyst you're doomed to get stuck in spending the rest of your career internally debating what's an acceptable sinthome and what isn't one.

talldrumking :

“There’s an essence of woman it’s $0” -Lacan

Goetheanist :

the way i see it is that they took the neitzschean conception of the subject as composed of drives,physiological values and extrapolated it too far hence removing the historicity , more actually the idiosyncrasies, of the subject in social subjectivity; hence there is only the concept of the present conditions of the subject in reference to their enviroment... what follows is that the subject is completely indeterminate abseent of said enviroment hence the subject in of itself exists as nothing... the concept of the subject having predispositions undermines this (for this is biologically true and affirmed by neitzsche ) in this the subject is taxonomically defined and then differentiated which is antithetical to alot of post-structuralists politic and psychology

Bobo :

Barabulka :

i got circumcised a week ago. what would Freud say about that?

1occorocco1 :

Partially disagree, great video tho

leon :

u kinda lost me at the $Oa part what is that supposed to mean

♢(Strich) :

D&G

petite waist white girl :

postmodernists think they can dismantle the master signifiers and constructs to achieve total liberation. but you can’t because that “construct” is what’s holding your sanity together. to deconstruct the master signifier is the destruction of the subjective framework itself, not liberation

talldrumking :

So this is why women be shopping

hyperrealhymns :

@Estranged Monarx