Celts are better at music, Germanics are better at war.
2026-08-04 02:14:10
0
HotShortsMusic :
RAHHHH SUEBI MENTIONED 🗣️🗣️🗣️
2026-07-28 07:18:07
9
🌲New England Jacobite 👑 :
"dominant all of Europe"
they didn't. lmao 🤣
2026-07-28 08:10:16
22
Annwfn🏴 :
The Celts lasted much longer than vikings. This is basic history. Celts lasted over a millennia, vikings lasted just a few centuries.
2026-07-28 08:17:06
3
ScipioAfricanus :
Not really. The Celts were urbanized, they had big cities and weren't too different from their romans invaders. While germans didn't have cities and had far less technology
2026-07-28 10:21:01
8
Carlito’s Way :
Celts genetically can’t handle really hot or cold weather, Germanics can
2026-07-28 13:36:40
7
twon :
if rome would've established its empire on germanic lands the same fate would've occurred to the germanics as it did to the celts. they would've been absorbed by the romans and the celts would've been considered the barbarians
2026-07-28 13:28:19
4
FlyingPheasantOfficial :
Anglo Saxon political and cultural values were so good. They’re organisation was unmatched
2026-07-28 01:04:32
19
bee :
that's incorrect. the welsh, who are classed the the most celtic country in the world never fell to Rome nor the germans
2026-07-28 11:44:31
3
Bj Örn :
Celts in middle Europe never left southern Germany, Switzerland and Austria - they just became parts of new Germanic tribes - you can prove this with dna - tribes are always an unexpected mixture
2026-07-29 22:30:49
3
bonnybighorse :
no one and nothing is celtic
2026-07-28 12:15:20
0
LucidMonk :
Celts were basically Charles Barkley in Jordan’s Era. Overshadowed by the Juggernaut
2026-07-28 01:23:59
54
Wolfe :
Rome did not defeat the Scots and Irish 😏
2026-07-28 16:57:16
1
giddymethat :
Celts establishing themselves at the same time as Rome? With hundreds of structures that are much older? Maybe I'm missing something as I'm not an expert.
2026-07-28 09:50:23
7
Zesnir :
Well you have the right data but came to the wrong conclusion/ framing. Germanics had to create larger federations in reaction to Rome and they would have absolutely fought the Romans if they could have won, but Romans in their prime were very hard to beat, even on germanic soil. Raids were common but after Teutoburger forest Germanicus paid the germanics frequent visits and punished them many timesfold for what they had done according to accounts at least. The Celts banded together in federations too under Vercingetorix for example but it was already too late and Caesar a far too skilled general and genius. Also many Celts were already part of the roman war machine like the once in “the province “ which is modern Frances “Provence” lol. Also Germanics didn’t really conquer Rome, they fled to it because Attila used them as a human weapon to flee into Rome and destabilize her.
2026-07-28 11:15:14
5
jk :
not Ireland
2026-07-28 19:44:16
0
Pongo Bongo :
Celt = round head
Germanic = long head
2026-07-30 09:35:01
0
menacetosobriety :
yet celts had more advanced steel than any of the larger tribes
2026-07-30 02:17:21
0
Virtus :
because we fight each other just as much as we fight an enemy. it's sad really.
2026-07-31 22:48:51
1
Goyleptic :
I don't think germanics dominated eastern europe
2026-07-28 06:27:08
0
Liam Browne :
Celts were established in North and Western Europe before Rome. Rome never made it to Ireland, Wales or Scotland. Germanic influence did come after with Norse, Norman and Anglo-Saxon invasions, but the time lines are off.
2026-07-28 14:07:31
3
user57813687287476 :
I think the timing aspect you mentioned is the most important part. The Celtic tribes in Western Europe were already fairly established and settled in their lands by the time of the late Roman republic. Therefore later during the migration period they weren’t able to mobilize their whole populations for movement and invasion like the germanics could.
2026-07-28 07:39:44
1
To see more videos from user @jonaskilker, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.