BONK :
If we wanna be serious here, we would also know the ai is pulling statistics from a definition that activley makes it harder for men to be included as victims, thus the flawed statistics as according to the offical fbi definition of 🍇 it is: penetration, no matter how slight, of the v@g or an_s with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a s#x organ of another person, without the consent of the victim. See how penetration is a key factor in it, the definition BEFORE that also proves my point though it was changed in 2013, it used to be: the carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will. Which completely erases male victims. Which is why again the statistics are flawed, and this definition isn't specifically in the U.S, WORLDWIDE(excluding Australia and New zealand if I'm not mistaken.) 🍇 requires the victim to be penetrated. Now if we want get statistics from an actual reliable source. According to the CDC which uses an inclusive definition of 🍇. When looking at specific 12-month periods in CDC data collection years, the estimated number of men who report being made to penetrate via physical force or coercion is virtually identical to or very close to the estimated number of women reporting completed rape during the same timeframe. 1.267 million men, and 1.270 million women, which as NOT as far as you think it is. Yes it is inherently sexist and or 'misandrist' as it is denying male victims.
2026-08-01 06:50:54