chappeah :
Hot take, Nolan’s Odyssey is thematically more consistent than the original epic, and the only critique I’d seriously give it is in the costume and prop department, but I can overlook that because it’s pretty clear that Nolan wanted to portray the greeks in dark armor as a visual representation that they are the bad guys, and armor design isn’t going to deter me from enjoying an adaptation, because it’s an adaptation. There is no proof anywhere that Nolan said this was “the most accurate adaptation”. The entire point is to apply modern themes to the story, to make it more accessible to modern audiences. The gods existing as manifestations of nature rather than people just showing up makes way more sense, as that is how people actually interact with the gods, and leaving it ambiguous if Athena was actually present, or as a manifestation of Odysseus’ guilt, is fantastic writing for the version of the character that Nolan wanted to portray. Nolan wanted to focus on the end of the bronze age, rather than Hermes giving Odysseus a bag of winds, and that should be ok for what Nolan wanted to portray. Emily Wilson’s critique comes off as pretentious and snobby more than anything, as if Nolan is the first director who’s version of the Odyssey needs to be 1 to 1 to the original, which would suck as a movie, full stop. The great thing about the Odyssey guys, is that it’s a timeless story, so it can be adapted again
2026-07-29 11:16:04