in a country where science based evidence collection is non existent, and judges almost always look at documents or may be testimony at best; this is useless. I have never heard in an Ethiopian trial where an expert witness has been called to the stand. all to say that in murder trials for example forensic evidence is crucial and able to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. How far along are we in the budget and interest to collect such evidences and actually listen to scientists about their validity.
Still, what constitute a maxim "beyond reasonable dout" is not explained. What is the point Abt this already popular maxim in this judgement. Yetepeye agelalets Kal bekal bnebeb!