@sunghnz_honniee: #jaywon #ship #gasukaskip📵 #jangansalpak #fyp

SH

Open In TikTok:

Region: ID

Saturday 01 August 2026 09:32:10 GMT

1802

334

4

12

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (0.74MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (0.74MB) Watermark .mp4 (1.5MB) Music .mp3

Comments

🙈🇨🇦 :

IYA IYA MILIK JAY SEORANG

2026-08-01 10:14:55

12

<______☆ :

muach

2026-08-02 02:21:44

1

To see more videos from user @sunghnz_honniee, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Tổng hợp áo 2 dây 🙆🏻‍♀️ #tiktokshop88

Tổng hợp áo 2 dây 🙆🏻‍♀️ #tiktokshop88

#CapCut @Yousif.a6505

#CapCut @Yousif.a6505

Ah ibom

True love isn't defined by superficial promises or temporary feelings; it is proven through loyalty, devotion, and standing firm together through life's hardest trials. When Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) spoke of Khadija (RA), he described a bond built on unconditional trust and sacrifice. She supported him with her wealth when he had little, stood by his side when the entire world turned away, and believed in him when everyone else called him a liar. That is the essence of a pure, blessed, and halal partnership—a spouse who builds you up, protects your heart, and strengthens your faith when the world gets tough. 🤍

True love isn't defined by superficial promises or temporary feelings; it is proven through loyalty, devotion, and standing firm together through life's hardest trials. When Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) spoke of Khadija (RA), he described a bond built on unconditional trust and sacrifice. She supported him with her wealth when he had little, stood by his side when the entire world turned away, and believed in him when everyone else called him a liar. That is the essence of a pure, blessed, and halal partnership—a spouse who builds you up, protects your heart, and strengthens your faith when the world gets tough. 🤍"She believed in me when people rejected me, she trusted in me when people disbelieved me, and she supported me with her wealth when people withheld from me." (Musnad Ahmad)

#manggamuda #manggakiojay #rujakmangga #rujakmanggamuda #kulinertiktok

#manggamuda #manggakiojay #rujakmangga #rujakmanggamuda #kulinertiktok

July 28–29 is the FOMC meeting window. Many traders will do the same thing: guess the rate decision, guess the index reaction, and guess whether technology stocks will rally. That is not a trading plan. It is a position built around a binary event. The Fed kept its target range at 3.50%–3.75% in June. June CPI eased by 0.4% month over month and core CPI rose 2.6% year over year. But headline CPI was still 3.5% year over year, while energy CPI remained 15.7% higher than a year earlier. The data is not one-directional. You do not need to prove that you are right before the meeting. You need to define how much you lose if you are wrong, when you do nothing without confirmation, and when the original thesis is no longer valid. Focus on risk structure, not rate-cut predictions. A good macro view is not automatically a good entry. Pre-event prices reflect expectations; post-event prices reveal the gap between expectations and reality. Without confirmation from price structure, volume, and volatility, a macro opinion is still only an opinion. Define invalidation before discussing upside. Event risk becomes dangerous when a gap makes the original stop irrelevant. If maximum loss cannot be defined, the trade does not have a usable R-multiple structure. Control what you can: position size, per-trade risk, overnight exposure, and the response when the thesis fails. You cannot control the wording of the statement, the press conference tone, or the market’s first-minute reaction. After the decision, let the market answer first. Does price accept a new range or immediately reverse? Do leading groups maintain relative strength, or is the move only an emotional spike? No confirmation, no urgency. Missing a fast move is manageable. Taking undefined risk because you do not want to miss it is the real problem. Track the event as part of a larger sample: your pre-event thesis, the policy outcome, the price reaction, and whether execution followed the plan. Do not obsess over one FOMC result. Evaluate whether your process can repeat and keep losses controlled when it fails. The conclusion is simple: You do not need a stronger prediction before the FOMC. You need a clearer invalidation point. Market outcomes are not controllable. Position size, risk, and discipline are.#fomc #fed #stocktok #stockmarket #trading

July 28–29 is the FOMC meeting window. Many traders will do the same thing: guess the rate decision, guess the index reaction, and guess whether technology stocks will rally. That is not a trading plan. It is a position built around a binary event. The Fed kept its target range at 3.50%–3.75% in June. June CPI eased by 0.4% month over month and core CPI rose 2.6% year over year. But headline CPI was still 3.5% year over year, while energy CPI remained 15.7% higher than a year earlier. The data is not one-directional. You do not need to prove that you are right before the meeting. You need to define how much you lose if you are wrong, when you do nothing without confirmation, and when the original thesis is no longer valid. Focus on risk structure, not rate-cut predictions. A good macro view is not automatically a good entry. Pre-event prices reflect expectations; post-event prices reveal the gap between expectations and reality. Without confirmation from price structure, volume, and volatility, a macro opinion is still only an opinion. Define invalidation before discussing upside. Event risk becomes dangerous when a gap makes the original stop irrelevant. If maximum loss cannot be defined, the trade does not have a usable R-multiple structure. Control what you can: position size, per-trade risk, overnight exposure, and the response when the thesis fails. You cannot control the wording of the statement, the press conference tone, or the market’s first-minute reaction. After the decision, let the market answer first. Does price accept a new range or immediately reverse? Do leading groups maintain relative strength, or is the move only an emotional spike? No confirmation, no urgency. Missing a fast move is manageable. Taking undefined risk because you do not want to miss it is the real problem. Track the event as part of a larger sample: your pre-event thesis, the policy outcome, the price reaction, and whether execution followed the plan. Do not obsess over one FOMC result. Evaluate whether your process can repeat and keep losses controlled when it fails. The conclusion is simple: You do not need a stronger prediction before the FOMC. You need a clearer invalidation point. Market outcomes are not controllable. Position size, risk, and discipline are.#fomc #fed #stocktok #stockmarket #trading

About

Robot
API

Legal

Privacy Policy