1. Home
  2. Detail

@lg.montagens:

LG Montagens
LG Montagens
Open In TikTok:
Region: BR
Saturday 01 August 2026 12:59:48 GMT
903
10
0
1

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (3.65MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (3.65MB) Watermark .mp4 (3.79MB) Music .mp3

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @lg.montagens, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

O enxofre pode ajudar no problema de pele 🌿
O enxofre pode ajudar no problema de pele 🌿
🤲🤲😭😭😭😭😭🤲🤲
🤲🤲😭😭😭😭😭🤲🤲
relatable memes 😁 ... #relatable #pakistan #memes #viral #fypシ
relatable memes 😁 ... #relatable #pakistan #memes #viral #fypシ
gin de 10 🕺🏻🪩
gin de 10 🕺🏻🪩
shockingly this was one of my most complimented looks ever??? #alrightchicken #OOTD
shockingly this was one of my most complimented looks ever??? #alrightchicken #OOTD
Reform want people to go to prison for campaigning in languages they don’t approve of. That’s plainly discriminatory - and they’ve already managed to fumble the amendment so much they’ve said they’re going to rewrite it. Thanks to Josiah Mortimer at @bylinetimes for interviewing me, you’ll see my detailed take in that original piece. When the Conservatives tried to table a similar but less strict amendment months ago, it was immediately voted down at debate for how ridiculous it was. It looks like Reform are trying to do it again - and it’s important you question why they want to table an amendment that already got voted down. What’s the plan here? For my wider thoughts on multilingualism and language diversity - which demand nuance and your attention span surpassing this video - they’re all in my book!!!
Reform want people to go to prison for campaigning in languages they don’t approve of. That’s plainly discriminatory - and they’ve already managed to fumble the amendment so much they’ve said they’re going to rewrite it. Thanks to Josiah Mortimer at @bylinetimes for interviewing me, you’ll see my detailed take in that original piece. When the Conservatives tried to table a similar but less strict amendment months ago, it was immediately voted down at debate for how ridiculous it was. It looks like Reform are trying to do it again - and it’s important you question why they want to table an amendment that already got voted down. What’s the plan here? For my wider thoughts on multilingualism and language diversity - which demand nuance and your attention span surpassing this video - they’re all in my book!!!

About

Legal