@wtnh8: Cities and towns across Connecticut are either reconsidering or doubling down on their use of Flock Safety cameras as questions arise around the use of its devices. News 8's Preston Stober visited a Milford city hall meeting where residents expressed their frustrations. Read more at the link in our bio, including more on arguments from city officials in favor of the cameras. #ct #ctnews #wtnh #flock #flockcameras

dubsintheshot :

Question; who voted for these politicians that made these decisions?

emismeiamem :

Six criminal cases per day? Is there really that much going on in Milford?😳

ERS :

Fight against state surveillance

grimgringhoul :

It doesn’t prevent crime.. that’s false

Labsbill :

Good detectives can also solve murders. We don’t need a mass surveillance state more than already exists

big daddy J :

All the politician should have a flock camera placed in front and the back of their homes

madone :

Start putting cameras pointing at govt buildings and see if they like it

B :

It’s warrantless search and seizure and it’s unconstitutional.

rubenortega310 :

1 murder but a lot of cops stalking ex’s lol

Todd Felm :

My problem is, these cameras read LP today, but they can always be upgraded to real time and facial recognition. I also don’t want to give this power of monitoring the citizens to people who shut businesses and force lockdowns during COVID.

lephren :

flock cameras are not welcome in Connecticut!

SlopBucket :

“We the people” sit in the jury box and have the final say on guilt or innocence if anyone is arrested for damaging these cameras. The jury box and work stoppage are two very powerful tools the citizens have to push back - nonviolently.

Rob Games :

or they can stop being lazy and go back to doing old fashioned investigations the kind where they actually get out and talk to people

Handd_Craftedd :

China does this and our own government calls it a terrible place with no freedom! Why should we have them? Read the Constitution 💯

Frog Pond General Store :

“Our officers abuse this technology 6 times a day” is what he meant

Todd White :

In other words, the police department is too lazy to do their job too busy sitting in parking lots in 120k vehicles and want cameras to do the work for them

PhuckinFastEV :

they hid the purchase in tricky wording too

trumpshitzhispants :

Way to go Milford!

Mike Neilsen :

ya'll realize Flock is the brand name. AXOM has a similar system and many other cameras. They have been using the technology for years. The only difference is Flock is nation wide and without jurisdiction oversight.

FartProudly :

Please: Someone ANYONE tell me a story of how crime has brought us to this point. I need serious examples of how society has wronged you on a criminal level personally.

Rex :

Flock cameras are a good thing, they just take a picture of your license plate

vvalpurgis :

🥓JustSomeone🥓 :

So the chief pretty much said he could care less about our privacy. I hope everyone remembers the politicians who approved the cameras when it’s voting time.

jakobwartooth :

de flock Florida

░m░a░t░t░e • Friend :

illegal geofence surveillance cameras were always illegal